Well isn't this special? According to Drudge, Kerry is getting more like Clinton everyday. Just can't get enough of them interns can we? I lifted the photo below from Michael M. Bates' site
What's neat about this scandal is it was probably leaked by a Dimocrat.
I'm just loving this Kerry stuff. And now, Hanoi Jane has opened her big fat mouth:
"Any attempt to link Kerry to me and make him look bad with that connection is completely false," the radical actress insisted.Although Fonda admitted that she and Kerry addressed the crowd that day from the same platform, she maintained that their contact was minimal. "I don't even think we shook hands."
From Newsmax.com
And here is Hanoi Jane in one of her shining moments.
I hate that bitch!
But back to Kerry. Harold Ford, an up and coming Dimocrat lost it on Fox and Friends.
"Don't bring that up," an angry-sounding Ford told "Fox & Friends" co-host Steve Doocy.Referring to the controversy over President Bush's military record, Ford threatened to "revive this thing on the National Guard" if questions about Kerry's Jane Fonda connection persist.
Wait a minute! Who brought up the Bush National Guard thing in the first place? Wasn't it the Dimocrats? Which of course seems rather hypocritical since the Dimocrats ran a draft dodger in 1992 and 1996. Military service didn't mean anything then. Why does it now?
"If you want to show pictures of him with Jane Fonda and other things, then the president ought to produce all the evidence [about his Guard service]," he railed.
That's just it. He has. But the only thing you hypocrites will settle for is if Mr. Peabody and Sherman fire up the Wayback Machine and we go back and see exactly what happened. Maybe then we could go back and see if Kerry shot the Viet Cong guy in the back for his silver star. And we could also see that Max Cleland was not a war hero but a dumb fuck who mishandled a grenade.
"I'm willing to put all of [Bush's Guard record] aside and not bring any of that up ... but you better do the same with John Kerry," proposed Ford. "It's clear where [Kerry] was [during the early 1970s] And at this moment it's unclear where the president was."
1. Have you cleared that with Bill Clinton and Terry 'sleazebag' McAullife?
2. We know where John Kerry was in the early 70's. He was betraying the men in Viet Nam who were fighting and dying for this country by hanging out with Hanoi Jane Fonda and telling lies about those fighting in Viet Nam.
By the way, you may have noticed that I call it Viet Nam rather than Vietnam. The reason that I do that is because we always put the word fucking in between Viet and Nam, as in Viet Fucking Nam. We did that with cities. e.g. Cua Fucking Viet. Da Fucking Nang. Chu Fucking Lai. Vung Fucking Tau. Yeah we hated that fucking war! But you know what we hated the most? We hated the fucking politicians who would not let us win the fucking war. We hated the fucking communist lovers who were against the war. We hated Jane Fonda. We hated the Viet Nam Verterans Against the War because those fuckers knifed us in the back with all the fucking lies they told about the 'atrocities' carried out by the soldiers in Viet Fucking Nam. That's why we hate John Fonda Kerry.
A lot has been made of John Kerry's service in Viet Fucking Nam. Just like Algore (Who served five months in a noncombatant role and had bodyguards) Kerry's tour was abbreviated. He served 4 months instead of the requisite year. I bet I spent more time in Nam than he did. And, yes, I got shot at. Unlike Kerry, I don't make a big deal out of my service.
Here's the deal. The real war heroes don't brag about their service. I did not agree philosophically with George McGovern, but I thought he was an honorable man. He was a WWII bomber pilot. I never heard him list that as a qualification for president. Bush 41 did not say that he was more qualified to be president than Bill Clinton because he was a war hero and Clinton was a cowardly draft dodger. The same thing goes for Bob Dole. When their country called, McGovern, Bush, and Dole served. Clinton pulled strings and then reneged on his deal to join ROTC. In 1992 the Dimocrats said this was a nonissue. Why is Bush's National Guard service an issue now? I thought we settled that bullshit in 1992. But then, if you are a Dimocrat, you have no shame. You can be a murderer (Kennedy), a draft dodger (Clinton), and a racist bigot and member of the KKK (Robert Byrd) and get away with it.
It's really sad what has happened to the Dimocrat Party. It used to have some integrity, but that ended with Clinton and McAuliffe. It is now the party of sleaze and hypocrisy.
I know some Dimocrats who still believe in the party's ideals, like Greg Greene whom I met at a blogger meetup and I really liked. I remember him telling me that some of his best friends are Republicans. Here is what he has to say about Kerry. And this is essential Greg:
I want to win, folks, but do we need to make fighting dirty our tactic of first resort?
That's true Greg. You and I agree on very little politically but I genuinely like you (I'm sorry I was unable to attend Kelly's meetup) and I admire your passion. You and your fellow Dimocrats need to take the party back from the Clintons and McAullife.
I had a bet with my friend Michael about Dean winning the nomination. I was hoping to lose that bet for two reasons:
1. If Dean was the nominee, he would replace McAuliffe.
2. The Dimocrats would be defeated so soundly that they would reexamine their beliefs, much like the Republicans did after Goldwater and decide what they really stood for.
I no longer trust a Dimocrat president to preside over foreign policy. Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton were disasters. But, having one party control the executive and the legislative branch has led to runaway spending. My friend Michael and I agree that gridlock is good.
And speaking of real heroes, here's another picture of my nephew.
His father informs me he is awesome with a handgun. I shudder to think what he could do with a 50. Eat your heart out Kim du Toit!
Posted by denny at February 12, 2004 09:21 PM