Bastards! Pricks! Assholes! Buttwipes! Jerkweeds! Asshats! Traitorous commie bastards! I'm pissed. I mean I'm really pissed!
I opened up the Atlanta Urinal and Constipation (or as reader Harold calls it, the Al Jazzera & Constitution) and right there on the front page was a story about POW's. It is Memorial Day weekend and we should be reading stories honoring soldiers. That is what Memorial Day is all about. So I expected sumpin' about POW's from other wars, not a hit piece. The fuckhead started off his story like this:
Washington --- They are infamous memorials to the inhumanity of war: The Bataan Death March. Stalags. The Hanoi Hilton.And now, Abu Ghraib.
GMAFB! This fucktard is comparing Abu Ghraib to the Bataan Death March? I am so fucking sick and tired about how the press is milking this story for all it's worth. I'm sick of it! Jesus H. Christ! We humiliated some fucking ragheads. These were not choirboys. Many of these assholes were our fucking enemies! It's not like we fed them into shredders or broke their arms and legs. Yeah, I was pissed when I first heard about it but now I'm getting pissed off at the press. The army was taking care of this before the booger eatin' moh-rons in the lamestrem media tried to make this story into the worst thing to have happened since the Holocaust. And now we have this asswipe trying to compare it to the Bataan Death March or the Hanoi Hilton. Enough of this shit! Stop it already!
It's like the poor sorry bastard who had to go see Doug Piranha:
Vercotti: Doug. (takes a drink) Well, I was terrified of him. Everyone was terrified of Doug. I've seen grown men pull their own heads off rather than see Doug. Even Dinsdale was frightened of Doug.Interviewer: What did he do?
Vercotti: He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor, bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious.
Yeah, we stripped 'em naked and humiliated them. We were vicious.
But the asstard continues.
These POWs' courageous stories are almost beyond belief. And they speak with a perspective few have earned, from the hard side of steel bars and cellblock beatings.''You would strip down and put hands behind your head and stand there and take it. They used a club that was like a baseball bat --- a little thinner but just as long,'' recalled Harris Chuck, 86, a Marine who was captured in Guam only days after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941. He was a POW until the Allied victory over Japan four years later.
And we made 'em strip down and form pyramids. We scared 'em with dogs. We had a stupid girl laugh at them. No fucking comparison. None at all.
The beatings were usually ''warranted,'' Chuck recalled. The POWs would steal rations, loot ships they were forced to load and sabotage whatever equipment they could. The toughest hardship was the diet --- only soup and rice --- which reduced Chuck's weight from 165 to 137 pounds.
So how much weight was lost by the prisoners in Abu Ghraib? Did we make them perform physical labor?
What happened to the Iraqi prisoners was wrong, said Sterno, 82, who lives in Brunswick.''But I can understand that Iraqi deal. Some MPs are bad people. I'm not saying all of them, but you get a few that were downright brutal,'' he said. ''Some were mean. Ninety percent of them are good people but there are always a few in every group. You find some who are sadistic.''
No shit! And we have a press that is so anti-American that this has been blown all out of proportion. We have some bad apples that the Army was in the process of courtmartialing and the press has made this the biggest violation of human rights that has ever occurred in the history of the world. We stripped some Arabs naked and humiliated them! The Army is trying and punishing the people involved. The President has apologized to the entire fucking world. He apologized to the fucking King of Jordan fer chrissakes! Let it go! I'm sick of it.
Harry Joslin said his Japanese captors never submitted him to sexual shame like the American MPs who stacked up naked Iraqi prisoners, forced them to masturbate, posed them degradingly and photographed it.''They treated us rudely, and there was not much food and we got whacked up a bit,'' Joslin said. ''But it was not at all like the POWs got treated in Iraq. None of that humiliation.''
Give me a choice of getting whacked up or forced to whack off, I'd take the whacking off. Humiliation? Spend six weeks in a hospital. By that time so many people have seen you naked that you don't have any shame. Humiliation? Suffer spinal cord injury where a nurse has to stick a tube up your dick so you can piss. Humiliation? A nurse has to stick a finger up your ass so you can shit. Don't talk to me about humiliation. When we start breaking bones and feeding people through shredders then this story could last six weeks. It has been overblown. Give it a fucking rest already!
I will give the asshole who wrote this article his due for actually presenting one dissenting opinion. Harris Chuck.
He is hesitant to condemn the six enlisted MPs who have been charged with abusing Iraqi inmates. He believes the war on terror is different from the ones he waged.''We were dealing with a different type of enemy than in Iraq,'' he said. ''Those bums are terrorists. They just hate our guts. So what are you going to do when they're captured?''
Let's feed 'em through shredders. The world didn't seem to bitch about Saddam Hussein doing that.
Look. What went on at Abu Ghraib was wrong, but the press just can't seem to get off of it. The brutal beheading of Nick Berg was news for about two days. Then it fell below the radar. Our lamestream media is still carrying on about Abu Ghraib.
I'm outraged that the bum who wrote this article about POW's used it to bash our military. Memorial Day should not be about Abu Ghraib. It should be about our soldiers who gave their lives for this country. It should be about all the soldiers who fought honorably for this country. That this asshole used Memoral Day to write a hit piece on the military just makes me sick to my stomach.
Can't they give this overblown story a rest for one weekend? Instead of asking the rest of the world, "Why do they hate us?", I think we need to ask the American press why do they hate America.
I just can't understand it.
Most of the mainstream media believes that the war on terrorism, and the war against the insurgency in Iraq, are police actions. If you accept that metaphor, and I do not, then it follows that the abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib is police brutality. And police brutality stories always get a lot of press.
It is a shame that we ever described wars, such as Vietnam or Korea, as "police actions." We did that because we wanted to soft-pedal the notion that we were at war. But we created two generations of reporters and editors who believe that the norms of police work should apply to our soldiers.
Posted by: Jack on May 30, 2004 10:11 PMGood god. It pisses me off not so much that this gets so much coverage by the media, as much as the context of the coverage. I've seen assholes write in papers that Abu Ghraib is the worst kind of atrocity. Which, as you said, minimalizes the real atrocities in our history. It's no different then asshat protestors with bush = hitler signs. I believe dissent, and protesting the actions of your government if you object to them is patriotic (even though i disagree with their stance). But comparing you're nations president to Hitler is unamerican, and there are no two ways about that. First off, it stupid slanderous speech with out any backing. Second, it minimalizes what a bastard hitler was.
Posted by: Ryley Hayes on May 30, 2004 10:15 PMWell, I've heard that besides the stripping and pyramid stuff, there were some other worse things that went on, like dragging people around by their dicks. Now that is pretty goddamned disgusting.
But I agree with you that obviously these sick actions are not representative of the entire US Army, and ESPECIALLY on Memorial Day I don't see why someone would want to do this. I guess for certain people, their personal agenda is just too important.
Posted by: Eric on May 31, 2004 12:55 AMReading the article, it almost seems like an editorial, but goin to the link it doesn't look like it. Lame.
Posted by: Eric on May 31, 2004 01:01 AMIt is simple, they want kerry elected. And at the same time, want to dimish the accomplishments of the military. For all their carrying on about how they support the troops, the fact is, they could give two shits less about them. A pox on them!
Posted by: A Sailor in the Desert on May 31, 2004 05:36 AMWhat I want to know is why folks continue to subscribe to that piece of shit "news" paper? There are so many other options, and voting with your subscription dollar is perhaps the only way to let those leftist pukes know that the audience for their liberal spew is non-existent outside 285. Why spend your dollars supporting a bunch of leftist creeps who use their ink to insult their suburban subcribers and promote their socialist, big government, all black all the time, agenda?
Posted by: marcel on May 31, 2004 10:20 AMThe cox sisters are the liberal jews that own the Atlanta papers. What else would you expect?
Posted by: jcunham on May 31, 2004 11:41 AMWell, don't get mad, get even. Your reader had it right, but don't stop there: The AJC should alwaysbe compared with other traditional propaganda sheets...Pravda, Goebbel's rag in Nazi Germany and one of the Shimbun's of Tojo.
If everyone adopted these accusatory slurs every time the AJC was mentioned, soon the slurs will get traction and the AJC will perhaps begin to see itself in it's true light.
Posted by: Rivrdog on May 31, 2004 12:24 PMEric - Of course I'm editorializing. My blog is an opinion piece, but the author of the article did use it to bash the gummint on Abu Ghraib. It had no place in an article about Memorial Day and comparing it to the Bataan Death March and the Hanoi Hilton was lame. Also having former POW's compare it to their experiences was even worse. And maybe worse things went on in Abu Ghraib than what we have been told but the perps are gonna be puished. I just wish they would go ahead and release all the pictures so we could get it over with.
Marcel and Rivrdog - Much as I hate the leftwing bias of the AJC I'm one of those people who likes to read the daily paper and it does give me a wealth of material for my blog.
Posted by: Denny Wilson on May 31, 2004 12:54 PMWhen I said editorial I was talking about the AJC article.
Posted by: Eric on May 31, 2004 06:44 PMSo, I go to the article in question at the AJC. Yup, not one mention of the American POWs who died in the mines in Japan. Not one mention of the American POWs who died in the Great Escape ("The Great Escape", by Paul Brickhill. Should be required reading in every high school across the land.)
And...where in 'ell is the email address for letters to the Editor?
Sleazoids run the AJC. But we knew that....
Posted by: Ward Gerlach on May 31, 2004 08:52 PMWard - The email address for the AJC is letters@ajc.com. I gave up writing them since I only had three letters out of ten published. That's when I started this blog.
Posted by: Denny Wilson on May 31, 2004 09:20 PMSo what do you expect from the lefty press? face reality, they want our soldiers killed, our field armies defeated, and our government overthrown. They are literally traitors, "giving aid and comfort to our enemies." I assume, Denny, that you have cancelled your subscription to the Urinal/Constipation and its ilk. I no longer subscribe to the Cincinnati Enquirer. We are in a war to the death for our civilization, and many of the key enemies are inside the USA.
Posted by: John Cunningham on May 31, 2004 11:28 PM