I can't believe that not only did I listen to John Fonda Kerry deliver this piece of crap but I also read through the entire speech just so I could do these five posts. I do this stuff just for you, my faithful readers.
We value jobs that actually pay you more than the job that you lost. We value jobs where, when you put in a week's work, you can actually pay your bills, provide for your children, lift up the quality of your life.
Maybe if you bastards didn't tax the shit out of us to fund your misguided social programs we wouldn't have to work so much. For many two income couples, the second income is to pay all the farkin' taxes.
We value an America where the middle class is not being squeezed, but doing better.
Squeezed by an incredible tax burden. Income tax. Sales taxes. Excise taxes.
Social Security taxes. Medicare taxes. Gas taxes. Ad valorum taxes. Real estate taxes. Registration fees. All sorts of hidden taxes. Check out your telephone bill for those.
So here is our economic plan to build a stronger America:
This oughta be good.
first, new incentives to revitalize manufacturing;
Howza 'bout tax cuts? There's a good incentive. By the way, evil business doesn't really pay taxes. They just imbed them into the cost of their products.
second, investment in technology and innovation that will create the good-paying jobs of the future;
All you have to do is get gummint out of the way and that will happen by itself.
third, close the tax loopholes that reward companies for shipping jobs overseas.
Isn't it ironic that the Poodle's owner's money comes from the Heinz Corporation that has shipped many of its jobs overseas? Dimocrats and hypocrisy go together so well don't they
Instead, we will reward the companies that create and keep good- paying jobs right where they belong, in the good old USA.
How are you gonna reward them? Lurch doesn't say. More empty rhetoric from an empty suit. Sorry, I used that line once before but it so fits this asshole.
We value an America that exports products, not jobs. And we believe American workers should never have to subsidize the loss of their own job.
Then quit over-regulating business!
Next, we will trade, and we will compete in the world. But our plan calls for a fair playing field, because if you give the American worker a fair playing field, there's no one in the world that the American worker can't compete against.
By this I bet he means tariffs. Tariffs are counterproductive. Much as I dislike Clinton, he did believe in free trade. Unusual for a Dimocrat.
And we're going to return to fiscal responsibility because it is the foundation of our economic strength. Our plan will cut the deficit in half in four years by ending tax giveaways that are nothing more than corporate welfare, and we will make government live by the rule that every family has to live by: Pay as you go.
Pay as you go? Gummint? GMAFB! This guy will outspend Bush. My biggest knock on Bush has been his rise in social spending. Compassionate conservative must be liberal lite. The spending that the Poodle and Babyface have in mind will make Bush look like a piker.
Let me tell you what we won't do: We won't raise taxes on the middle class.
The last Dimocrat who said this was Bill Clinton and then he and the Dimocrats passed the largest tax increase in history. If Lurch gets elected, hang on to your wallets.
You've heard a lot of false charges about this in recent months. So let me say straight out what I will do as president: I will cut middle-class taxes.
That's what Bill Clinton said.
I will reduce the tax burden on small business.
I got a bridge for sale here.
And I will roll back the tax cuts for the wealthiest individuals who make over $200,000 a year, so we can invest in health care, education and job creation.
Tax the rich! Tax the rich! Dimocrats remind me of those little talking dolls that have the string in the neck that you pull to make them talk.
Pull the string. Tax cuts for the rich.
Pull the string. Bush lied.
I did a post on this last year.
Our education plan for a stronger America sets high standards and it demands accountability from parents, teachers and schools. It provides for smaller class sizes, and it treats teachers like the professionals that they are.
What a load of crap. The Dimocrats and the teachers unions have all but destroyed what was once a great public school system. They have turned our schools into socialist indoctrination centers.
Let me tell you sumpin' about class size. I was on the leading edge of the baby boomers (born in 1946). Our class sizes were around 30 students and we learned. We didn't learn self esteem. We learned how to read and write. We learned how to add and subtract. If someone couldn't keep up, he repeated the grade. There was no such thing as social promotion.
Starting in junior high (back in the 50's that was grades 7-9) we were tracked. That means students were put together according to aptitude. That way the bright students were grouped with bright students so they could have additional challenges. In high school English the brighter students like (ahem) me (Oops! I sprained my arm trying to pat myself on the back) had to read the unabridged version of Moby Dick. What a boring book! The less bright students got to read an abridged version.
And there was discipline. Part of the lack of discipline stems from parents not wanting the schools to discipline little Jason and Jennifer. If I got in trouble at school, I got in more trouble at home. Once I got thrown against a bank of lockers by the assistant principal, Mr. Schaum. Do you think I complained to my parents? Are you kidding? My dad would have had his belt off so fast it would have made my head spin.
Gummint is the problem. Parents need to demand discipline and accountability. They won't get it from Dimocrats or the teachers unions.
And it gives a tax credit to families for each and every year of college.
Cut taxes overall.
When I was a prosecutor, I met young kids who were in trouble, abandoned, all of them, by adults.
The products of Lyndon Johnson's Great Fucking Society.
And as president, I am determined that we stop being a nation content to spend $50,000 a year to send a young person to prison for the rest of their life, when we could invest $10,000 in Head Start, Early Start, Smart Start, a real start to the lives of our children.
Start me up! Head Start doesn't really work. I doubt if the other Starts do either. The people you are talking about are members of the permanent underclass that your party's social programs created. You don't solve poverty by giving money to poor people.
And we value health care that's affordable and accessible for all Americans.
Here it comes. Socialized medicine.
Since 2000, 4 million people have lost their health insurance. Millions more are struggling to afford it. You know what's happening.
Thank Babyface and his trial lawyer friends for pushing up the cost of health insurance. Here's a novel idea. Since you are so fond of tax credits, howza 'bout a tax credit (A credit not a deduction) for health insurance?
Your premiums, your co-payments, your deductibles have all gone through the roof.
As I said. Thank Babyface.
Our health care plan for a stronger America cracks down on the waste, and the greed and the abuse in our health-care system, and it will save families $1,000 a year in premiums. You'll get to pick your own doctor. And patients and doctors, not insurance company bureaucrats, will make medical decisions.
Bill Whittle wrote in one of his essays about someone having an idea and making that idea work. When he asked what the process was in between he was told, "That's when the magic happens". I prefer to use Ironbear's term PFM (Pure Fucking Magic). We're about to see that now.
Under our health care plan. Medicare will negotiate lower drug prices for seniors. And all Americans will be able to buy less expensive prescription drugs from countries like Canada.
As soon as we are able to do that, the drug companies will no longer give the price break to the Canadian health system and the price will reach an equilibrium, unless the drug companies are able to buy enough politicians to prevent that from happening. I'm actually in favor of us buying drugs from Canada. Let the marketplace work it's magic and the Canadians can help subsidize the rest of the world like we do.
The story of people struggling for health care is the story of so many Americans. But you know what? It's not the story of senators and members of Congress, because we give ourselves great health care, and you get the bill.
And you assholes give yourselves raises every year. And about that bill? We ain't getting our money's worth.
Well, I'm here to say tonight: Your family's health care is just as important as any politician's in Washington, D.C.
Here it comes....
And when I am president, we will stop being the only advanced nation in the world which fails to understand that health care is not a privilege for the wealthy, and the connected and the elected; it is a right for all Americans.
And it says so right in the Constitution. That attorney general I'm gonna appoint that will enforce the Constitution will show me where it is.
And we will make it so.
Poof! PFM!
We value an America that controls its own destiny because it's finally and forever independent of Mideast oil. What does it mean for our economy and our national security when we have only 3 percent of the world's oil reserves, yet we rely on foreign countries for 53 percent of what we consume?
That we use a lot of energy? Maybe it's because we are the richest country on this planet.
I want an America that relies on its ingenuity and innovation, not the Saudi royal family.
Wait for it.
And our energy plan for a stronger America -- our energy plan will invest in new technologies and alternative fuels and the cars of the future, so that no young American in uniform will ever be held hostage to our dependence on oil from the Middle East.
Poof! PFM! This is from a party that will not let us build dams for hydropower because it might kill a fish. This is from a party that will not allow us to drill in ANWR because it might harm the environment. This is from a party that will not allow us to drill offshore because of the aformentioned environment. This is from a party that will not allow us to build nuclear power plants because they are evil. This is from a party that has not allowed us to build a new refinery since the late 70's. This is from a party that has put up a roadblock to almost any rational plan to help us decrease our reliance on foreign oil. This is from a party whose energy plan is Poof! PFM!
I've told you about our plans for the economy, for education, for health care, for energy independence. I want you to know more about them.
<rachellucas>And. It. Was. All. A. Crock. Of. Shit.</rachellucas>
So now I'm going to say something that Franklin Roosevelt could never have said in his acceptance speech: Go to johnkerry.com.
If the bullshit in this speech wasn't enough for you, there is more there.
I want to address these next words directly to President George W. Bush.In the weeks ahead, let's be optimists, not just opponents. Let's build unity in the American family, not angry division. Let's honor this nation's diversity. Let's respect one another. And let's never misuse for political purposes the most precious document in American history, the Constitution of the United States.
Build unity by honoring diversity? WTF? Misuse the Constitution for political purposes? Is that like all of a sudden, for the first time in the history of the Republic judges now have to be approved in the Senate by a super majority? Is that the kind of politicizing the Constitution that you're talking about Senator? Your party only wants judges who can read things in the Constitution that are not there like the "right" to health care. Like the "right" for cheap prescription drugs. Your party is the party that thinks the Constitution is a "living document" and if there is sumpin' in there that you disagree with but can't get passed in the legislature, you go find a liberal judge who will all of a sudden find some magical words in the Constitution. Poof! PFM!
AUDIENCE: Kerry, Kerry, Kerry...
I just left that audience part in so you could see that the Dimocrats were just eatin' this speech up.
My friends, the high road may be harder, but it leads to a better place.
That really touched me.
And that's why Republicans and Democrats must make this election a contest of big ideas, not small-minded attacks.This is our time to reject the kind of politics calculated to divide race from race, region from region, group from group.
Have you talked to Michael Moore and Whoopi Goldberg about small minded attacks? Howza 'bout Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. Howza 'bout the NAACP?
And a big part of your campaign is based on class warfare. Y'know that "tax the rich" stuff.
Maybe some just see us divided into those red states and blue states, but I see us as one America: red, white and blue.
Baby face sees us as two Americas. You guys better start getting your stories straight.
And when I am president, the government I lead will enlist people of talent, Republicans as well as Democrats, to find the common ground, so that no one who has something to contribute to our nation will be left on the sidelines.
Now he's stealing from John Kennedy.
And let me say it plainly: In that cause, and in this campaign, we welcome people of faith. America is not us and them.
Y'see, he's a Catholic who doesn't agree with most of the doctrines of the Catholic Church. So I guess it all depends on what your meaning of faith is.
I think of what Ron Reagan said of his father a few weeks ago, and I want to say this to you tonight: I don't wear my religion on my sleeve, but faith has given me values and hope to live by, from Vietnam to this day, from Sunday to Sunday.
What a fookin' hypocrite!
I don't want to claim that God is on our side.
Then why bring it up?
As Abraham Lincoln told us, I want to pray humbly that we are on God's side.
If He is, then you won't win this election.
And whatever our faith -- whatever our faith, one belief should bind us all: The measure of our character is our willingness to give of ourselves for others and for our country.
Yep. Figgered out how to get out of 'Nam in four months. Then stabbed in the back all of the people he left behind.
These aren't Democratic values.
That's for sure!
These aren't Republican values. They're American values. We believe in them. They're who we are. And if we honor them, if we believe in ourselves, we can build an America that is stronger at home and respected in the world.So much promise stretches before us. Americans have always reached for the impossible, looked to the next horizon and asked, "What if?"
What if there were no liberals?
Two young bicycle mechanics from Dayton asked, "What if this airplane could take off at Kitty Hawk?" It did that, and it changed the world forever.A young president asked, "What if we could go to the moon in 10 years?" And now we're exploring the stars and the solar systems themselves.
Wrapping himself in the mantle of John Kennedy again. We knew John Kennedy Senator. You are no John Kennedy.
A young generation of entrepreneurs asked, "What if we could take all the information in a library and put it on a chip the size of a fingernail?" We did, and that, too, changed the world.And now it's our time to ask, "What if?"
What if this speech will never end? Horrors!
What if we find a breakthrough to cure Parkinson's, diabetes, Alzheimer's and AIDS?
What if?
What if we have a president who believes in science, so we can unleash the wonders of discovery like stem-cell research and treat illness for millions of lives?
We have stem cell research. It turns out that the most promising areas are in adult stem cells and umbilical stem cells and not embryonic stem cells.
What if we do what adults should do, and make sure that all of our children are safe in the afternoons after school? What if we have a leadership that's as good as the American dream, so that bigotry and hatred never again steal the hope or future of any American?
It's a wonderful day in the neighborhood. Why don't you muzzle some of the hatred coming from the left like your fellow Dimocrats calling Bush Hitler and the Republican Party Nazi's. I'm sorry Senator, but there is much more hatred and bigotry spewing from the left than there is from the right.
I learned a lot about these values on that gunboat patrolling the Mekong Delta with Americans -- you saw them -- who come from places as different as Iowa and Oregon, Arkansas, Florida, California.
He was in Viet Nam? No shit?
No one cared where we went to school. No one cared about our race or our backgrounds. We were literally all in the same boat. We looked out, one for the other, and we still do.
Uh. That's not true.
That is the kind of America that I will lead as president: an America where we are all in the same boat.
The Titanic?
Never has there been a moment more urgent for Americans to step up and define ourselves. I will work my heart out. But, my fellow citizens, the outcome is in your hands more than mine.
Do you want to fight terrorism are appease it? If you want to appease them, vote for the Poodle. Ask yourself whom the terrorists would prefer as president.
It is time to reach for the next dream. It is time to look to the next horizon. For America, the hope is there. The sun is rising. Our best days are still to come.
He's channeling Ronald Reagan!
Thank you. Good night. God bless you, and God bless the United States of America.
Thank God the speech is over!
Posted by denny at August 4, 2004 11:13 PMDenny,
I know you've probably seen it already.When I saw the swiftboats vets new ad, I thought, Denny will like this. hehe
" And I will roll back the tax cuts for the wealthiest individuals who make over $200,000 a year, so we can invest in health care, education and job creation."
A great many of the small businesses at the heart of our currently improved jobs scenario are organized under tax classifications that allow the IRS to tax the owner's business revenue as personal income. Any such business generating income in excess of 200,000 large will be robbed, under Kerry's watch, of the current tax cut and any likely incentive to "grow" the enterprise.
"Instead, we will reward the companies that create and keep good- paying jobs right where they belong, in the good old USA."
Kerry is willing to blunder around arbitrarily taxing away any incentive by small business to create new jobs at the same time that the business model for our economy is changing. The companies that he will reward, presumably through corporate tax cuts, for keeping jobs in the US are increasingly looking to smaller, more agile organizations to provide a hose of products, skills, and services at a lower cost and with less overhead than "mega" comanies can provide. Much of the opportunity for small businesses and the current job growth are to be found within the movement toward this new dynamic. (I absolutely refuse to say paradigm!) Kerry and his "band of (socialist) brothers" (Humble apologies to the Bard) are lumbered with the idea that the American job market will continue to be driven by the kind of near monolithic corporate enterprises that seemed to have peaked economically in the late 60's to early 70's. That model will never return and the rate at which our current model is changing at an intimidating rate.
Inconsistent and myopic? Nah! Not the Democratic Elite! They are putting on blinders and applying the brakes as hard as they can. They know that they are not not as adaptive as the entrepreneur who, in a minimally regulated free enterprise economy, takes advantage of opportunity. They know they have created a "jobs entitlement" mindset that enervates their political base to the notion of adapting individual behavior (see learning)to meet the demands of a changing job market.
Sorry! Got a little long winded there. I guess I won't rant about US employees gleefully undercutting European labor costs (BMW, Michelin, Mercedes, Bosch) but decrying loss of those or similar jobs overseas.
Posted by: Ryan on August 5, 2004 01:50 AMI hate it when I hit the "post" instead of the "preview" button before I correct my grammatical blunders.
Sheesh!
Posted by: Ryan on August 5, 2004 01:55 AMBush and Kerry are cousins, and have the same secret agenda. What does it matter if you vote for either, when the results will be just another asshole in charge of (what used to be) the greatest nation on Earth? What does it matter?
Posted by: Eric on August 5, 2004 04:02 AMUnder our health care plan. Medicare will negotiate lower drug prices for seniors. And all Americans will be able to buy less expensive prescription drugs from countries like Canada.
Isn't this outsourcing by another name?
Posted by: A Sailor in the Desert on August 5, 2004 04:47 AMYou gave me a real flashback there! There are few sounds more motivating than a belt clearing belt loops! Shame that stopped, really.
Posted by: GOC in Winston Salem on August 5, 2004 04:58 AMWhat if we find a breakthrough to cure Parkinson's, diabetes, Alzheimer's and AIDS?Well, if the 'cure' did not work on a few people, the friends of your running mate, Mr. Two Americas, would sue the companies that made the cures for many millions of dollars and drive the price of the 'cure' into a prohibitive range.
From there, you and your non-thinking Democrat friends would decry the "outrageous" price(s) of drugs and demand a fully socialized health-care system in order to "make drugs more affordable".
It is a nice self-reinforcing loop they have going.
What if we do what adults should do, and make sure that all of our children are safe in the afternoons after school?
And that's why Republicans and Democrats must make this election a contest of big ideas, not small-minded attacks.
I've told you about our plans for the economy1, for education2, for health care3, for energy independence4...
If someone has not already seen this, they really should. It may be the most damning ad (against a politician) that has ever existed.
Posted by: addison on August 5, 2004 05:25 AM"Under our health care plan. Medicare will negotiate lower drug prices for seniors. And all Americans will be able to buy less expensive prescription drugs from countries like Canada.
Isn't this outsourcing by another name?"
Sailor:
No, it's playing off people's ignorance.
Canada sets a price for drugs, and since the entire country of Canada (health care wise) is smaller than California, the drug companies have (for some reason) gone along with it.
So what's happening is people are buying drugs with price ceilings in .ca, then shipping them back here, where they can sell them for less than they cost from the manufacturer.
(My solution would be to cut off sales of new drugs to Canada, and see how long it takes them to fix things). Apparently a couple are cutting off distributors when lots they sold them show back up in the US. (and are then being called names for doing that).
Kerry saying that's part of his plan is more evidence that he will say anything, no matter how dumb (What, you're going to make the drug companies sell more drugs to .ca rather than limiting supply up there, too?).
Posted by: Addison (the other one) on August 5, 2004 10:23 AMKerry doesn't get it (or he doesn't want to admit it): CORPORATIONS DON'T PAY TAX. PEOPLE PAY TAX. THE CORPORATION IS JUST A CONVENIENT COLLECTION POINT. Workers pay the corporate income tax through lower wages. Consumers pay the corporate income tax through higher prices. Investors (you know, those fabulously wealthy people with 401(k)s and IRAs) pay the corporate income tax through lesser returns on their investment.
Also, a "loophole" is an unintended tax benefit reaped through an ambiguity in the tax law. A tax "preference" is intentional, but I guess that term is not as politicially charged.
John Kerry is an ASSHOLE!
Posted by: Erik on August 5, 2004 11:28 AMExcellent post, Denny! Thank you for providing me with some weapons to fight my socialist friends who hate big business.
Posted by: Paul on August 5, 2004 12:00 PMMost of the second income in our house goes towards child care...
Posted by: Susan on August 5, 2004 05:07 PMIt is truly sad that John Kerry can only provide one fellow swift boat member to endorse him. When in the photograph that he constantly portrays, there are 23 members-22 of which do not endorse him.
Posted by: agdegro on August 5, 2004 06:56 PMGreat post with great ammo for me to use on my union brothers in work. Why does everyone of these socialist, liberal, dims want to be like Europe? I still have never heard a rational explanation from any of these liberal elites, including Kerry. Also, how ironic is it that the Dims are trying to stop the anti-Kerry swift boat ad from running? The party of free speech and 1st ammendment rights my ass. They can have moveon.org and all these Soros orgs, but some swift boat vets feel they have a moral duty to tell the people what a fraud Kerry really is and they cry foul.Every time I hear a dimocrat talk about Bush ads that recount Kerry's record in the senate as attack ads, I know I'm on the right side(no pun intended). If someone uses your own record against you and you can't rebutt them, wtf are you doing running anyway? Keep up the great work Denny, you and your band of brothers and ladies too, do us all a great service.
Posted by: Paul in Pa on August 5, 2004 08:10 PMThe kerry speech interspersed with wisecracks and a few retorts which lack evidence and balance does not make political commentarry. Your attitudec to the enviroment is umbalanced, yoour attitude to the poor and criminality is frankly disturbing.
Posted by: matthew g on August 6, 2004 07:15 AMThoughts about socialized medicine.
The question is asked, why is America the only industrialized nation without health care coverage for all its citizens? Good question; I don't have an answer.
Universal coverage can be done poorly (i.e., Canada, the UK), or it can be done well--or so I hear. Has anyone ever thought to look at the systems in non-English speaking countries? A friend of mine raved about the German system. I hear France does it well. I live in Japan, where paying for health insurance is mandatory, but you can opt out of the gummint plan by going private.
When I was a grad student in Japan, I paid about $10/mo. for insurance. Now that I work, I pay $200-300/mo. (they change the rates every 6 months, and even though my salary stays the same, the amount I have to pay fluctuates for reasons I don't understand). Regardless of what I have to pay, the coverage is the same. I don't mind paying more now, because I took advantage of the lower rates when I was a student. (Does this make me a socialist? I hope not!)
I'm not saying we need to socialize medicine in the US. I do think we need to have affordable health insurance for everyone, but I don't know what the best way to achieve that is. I suspect that a combination of public and private systems may work, but again, don't ask me for details--I just don't know.
Posted by: Squidley on August 6, 2004 09:32 AMMatthew - The speech was total bullshit. He spent an hour saying absolutely nothing of any import. I just pointed that out. My attitude towards the environemnt is unbalanced? Matthew, this is an opinion site. You won't find balance here. My attitude towards the poor is that 90% of them wouldn't be poor if they had made the right choices.
1. Stay in school.
2. Start work early. I started cutting lawns, raking leaves, cleaning gutters, shoveling snow, and babysitting when I was 14.
3. Do not have children you cannot afford.
I have no problems taking care of the people who, through no fault of their own, find themselves in poverty. I dislike supporting multigenerational parasites on society. The Dimocrats, with their misguided social programs have created a class of people like that.
Crime? I'm tough on crime. If you can't do the time, don't do the crime. But I do think that drug users do not belong in the general prison population. They belong in treatment centers. I also know that poverty breeds crime. Eliminate poverty and the crime rate will decrease, but, you do not eliminate poverty by giving money to poor people. See the three steps to avoid poverty above.
Denny sez: "Tariffs are counterproductive." How do you feel about the waffling of W, who went from being a self-proclaimed free trader to a tariff-imposer (steel tariffs, to appease voters in the rust belt)? I guess he's a free trader again, because the tariffs have been lifted.
Posted by: Squidley on August 6, 2004 09:42 AMSquidley - On more than one occasion I have railed against the steel tariffs. I think Bush made a mistake on that. It didn't get him any votes either. I have also lambasted that abominable farm bill. That didn't get him any votes either. If you remember, when you first started hanging out here I said I was a one issue guy in this election and that issue is the War on Terror. I have been outraged at Bush's domestic spending. It might be better to have a Dimocrat in office 'cause then the Republicans in Congress might do to Kerry what they did to Clinton and pull him to the center. But, I don't trust Kerry on the WOT just like I didn't trust Dimocrats during the Cold War.
The French and Germans are paying heavily for their health care with 10% unemployment and imploding economies. (BTW, where would you rather have heart surgery? France or the US? Do you realize that a lot of those people who died from the heat last summer were in French hospitals and nursing homes?) As their populations are aging and their birthrate is declining, they have to depend more and more on immigrants. Hence, France's demographic time bomb with Muslims. The French gummint is trying to reform their social programs because they are too expensive. What they are going through now (and Germany to a lesser extent) we will see with Social Security in about 10 to 20 years.
How many times do I have to say this? Socialism does not work!!!!!
My solution to health care is give us a tax credit to pay our premiums. The gummint does not want to do that because the socialists do not want us to have control over our decisions.
I really like your idea about a tax credit for health insurance premiums. However, some people are going to ask how that helps low-income individuals, like students, the working poor, etc.
As long as we're talking issues, I just want to make it clear that Ashcroft is not my "one issue." I also have serious problems with Rumsfeld, Cheney, and W himself. However, I'm no Kerry fan either. At this point, I see myself faced with a classic "lesser of two evils" problem: W or Kerry. I won't be voting for one as much as against the other.
Posted by: Squidley on August 7, 2004 06:44 AMPoliticians - all politicians - talk bullshit: kery, blair, bushbaby or howard/dracula. on this one can count. all political speeches, especially american ones. at the moment, the latter seem to be riddled with platitudes and catch-phrases about patriotism, war, and not much else. this applies to both bush and kery, with bush rying to appear likke a war-leader to eflet attention away from his failing homme policies, whereas kery is trying to appear like some kind of heroic vet. both have roughly the same policies, making this autum's elections relatively meaaningless. Democracy?
appropos enviroment, I am worried that you seek to drill for more oil. wat about when that runns out? the ensuing conflict will be hellish. we need, as a species, to be weening ourselves off this 'black gold' and onto more renewable energy sources.
Poverty is a toughie. I am against leaving the poor to the free market because, given its very sell-your-own-mother natue, is likely to just make more poor people. Yet state handouts will only make such people reliant on the state. This is why i believe such hand-outs need to be in line with minimum wage, to encourage independance.
Posted by: matthew g on August 7, 2004 10:38 AMSquidley - The poor have Medicaid and the old folks have Medicare. I do not propose doing away with them even tho' they are expensive. I do think both Medicare and Medicaid should be converted to some kind of managed care. The rest of us should get tax credits for our health care. As for managed care, I'm in an HMO and I am a very high maintenance guy and I have had very little problems with my HMO.
Matthew - Yes the oil will eventually run out but that will be way into the future. Once again, the marketplace will find an answer when the price of oil finally goes out of sight. In the meantime, to conserve, we should build more nuclear power plants and more dams. The envirowackos will not let us. ANWR is in a tiny little part of what is essentially an arctic desert. Also,we have many plugged oilwells in Texas and Oklahoma that were plugged because the cost of extracting oil was too expensive. As the price of oil goes up, these wells will be redrilled. Also coal can be converted into oil at a price. The marketplace will determine when that is worth doing. Likewise shale.
As for the poor, "the poor will always be with us". As I said, I have no problem taking care or the 10% who are poor through no fault of their own. It's the other 90% that needs to be fixed. Welfare reform has gone a long way. The Dimocrats do not like to admit it but it is working. The key is education and the biggest impediment to that is the teachers unions and the Dimocrat Party. A majority of blacks prefer vouchers to get their children out of failing schools but their party, the Dimocrats are standing in the schoolhouse door keeping them in.
The Dimocrats say we should fix the schools and their solution, like their solution to everything, is to throw money at it. Money without accountabilty won't work and the teachers unions do not want accountability.
And now I can tell that you are getting your American news from biased leftists sources. Bush's policies are working. We are out of the recession and jobs are growing. Why do you think that the two issues Kerry is running on are he was a Viet Nma vet and he is not Bush? He cannot run on the economy. Right now we have the strongest economy in the world.
Thanks for the clarification oh health care, Denny. I've been out of the country so long I forgot about stuff like that.
As for Bush's policies working, I'm of the school of thought that the president and his policies have little impact on the economy. Certain actions can have dampening effects, and some policies may help growth, but in general, presidents are either lucky (e.g., Clinton) or unlucky (e.g., Bush I) when it comes to what happens with the economy while they're in office.
Posted by: Squidley on August 9, 2004 05:23 AM