January 10, 2005

One Shot, One Kill

Sent to me by Charlieb.

The shooter:

The shootee: (Caution! Not for the faint of heart!)

This is a primo example of a good terrorist. He didn't get a chance to detonate his explosive belt. No virgins for this guy.

Posted by denny at January 10, 2005 08:23 PM  
Comments

Ooh, yummy.

Posted by: Ralph Gizzip on January 10, 2005 09:03 PM

Darn, I guess they won't show *these* photos on the major news networks.

I mean, the poor guy didn't even get a chance to blow himself up first and *then* make a news story to report on!

Posted by: Neo on January 10, 2005 09:13 PM

Yikes

Posted by: Alli on January 10, 2005 09:16 PM

KFOR is in Europe, could be an urban legend.

Posted by: Veteran on January 10, 2005 09:59 PM

I am unusually warmed by this photo. Sick as it is, it's still gratifying to say goodbye to another worthless piece of shit! Fuckin' terrorists make me PUKE! I worked counter-terrorim last Gulf war. Keep up the good work, boys! It's your turn now.

Posted by: The Moose on January 10, 2005 10:24 PM

It's about time!! Looks like a .50 BMG rifle, but I could be wrong. We need to do that to a lot more terrorists!! The TSM won't publish those photos though.....they like the terrorists to be able to kill a lot of inocents when they detonate their suicide belt. That didn't happen here. This photo gives me a very warm and fuzzy feeling. Nice shootin'!!

Posted by: Vulgorilla on January 10, 2005 10:47 PM

Concur on the comment about KFOR. These fellows are stationed in Kosovo. Another area where the US Military is serving to protect the adherants of the religion of peace.

Posted by: Barry on January 10, 2005 11:08 PM

Looks like "God DID sort them out." Good kill.

Posted by: Gene Pool on January 10, 2005 11:10 PM

I thought that 50 cal would have blown his whole head off,and good shot!

Posted by: Pharaoh on January 11, 2005 04:21 AM

Eeyew, splatter! Is that a Barrett?

Posted by: Justthisguy on January 11, 2005 04:49 AM

Yoiks!

Posted by: Dorothy on January 11, 2005 06:39 AM

Allah Akbar, my ass!!!

One shot, one kill!!

Posted by: raving republican on January 11, 2005 08:56 AM

I didn't like looking at that photo. But I'd rather look at that for half a tick than attend a funeral for one of our own.
One shot one kill~Bravo!

Posted by: lisakay on January 11, 2005 09:07 AM

Nice shot!

So can you say that terrorswine had a...splitting headache? ;-)

--TwoDragons

Posted by: Denita TwoDragons on January 11, 2005 10:24 AM

As one of my co-workers put it: "Looks like he was ready to blow himself up until the .50 cal 'changed his mind'."

Posted by: Valdis on January 11, 2005 10:28 AM

Good start. Where do I send the man more ammo?

Posted by: Doc on January 11, 2005 10:35 AM

Yeah, that's a Barrett. .50 cal, semi-auto.

Posted by: Mark on January 11, 2005 10:46 AM

The right tool for the job, and the right man for the tool. Lovely combination.
How many virgins does that dude rate?

Posted by: Walter E. Wallis on January 11, 2005 11:37 AM

I love terrorist brain splatter in the morning. Looks like......victory!

: )

Posted by: daniel on January 11, 2005 12:15 PM

One less "SN". Good news, a typhoon is heading for Indonesia. Hope it get's the rest of them.

Posted by: Clyde Hart on January 11, 2005 12:25 PM

That picture made my day! :D

Posted by: Mashby on January 11, 2005 12:48 PM

Hooah.

Posted by: oldcontroller on January 11, 2005 12:55 PM

"Allah be pr...aaah! I just shit myself."

Posted by: Jason on January 11, 2005 01:46 PM

THAT is gun control!

Posted by: Len - KC on January 11, 2005 02:30 PM

Pop goes the weasel...


Posted by: Rich on January 11, 2005 03:20 PM

Ah, this is giving me some great ideas for Halloween--too bad it's 10 months away!

Posted by: Dar on January 11, 2005 03:55 PM

I don't buy it. To much head left to be the victim of a .50bmg.

Posted by: Nate on January 11, 2005 04:33 PM

Semper Fi ! Carry on Soldier!!!!

Posted by: Tom on January 11, 2005 05:21 PM

The bottom pic is real, but the top pic is unrelated. The shot was actually made by a kid in the Alabama Guard, using a Barret bolt-action.

Nate, the reason there's any head left at all is because the bullet struck inside the top quarter of the skull. A hit in the center (through the nose) would have removed the entire head.

No matter: end result was the same.

Posted by: Kim du Toit on January 11, 2005 05:33 PM

" athing of beauty, and a joy forever"

Posted by: mikeymom on January 11, 2005 05:54 PM

Just wait,barret has a conversion kit and rifle coming out,to go up to a ONE inch bullet.

Posted by: big al on January 11, 2005 06:18 PM

And another one gone, another one gone, another one bites the dust!

Posted by: laura on January 11, 2005 07:10 PM

Just hired the girl across the street to help
the wife on a cathering job as a cook.

Turn out she was a captain in the Canadian Army
and qualified as a sniper.

Told us about her final test for qualifying.

Was given TWO(.50cal) bullets to shoot to snuff
out a candelabra with FOUR candles at 300 yards.

How'd she do it???

.

.

.

Found out yet???

.

.

.

OK, here go:

First, nick oh so lightly the BASE of the
candelabra to turn it and align the candles,
then snuff the four lights out with the last bullet.

This is what happen with the terrorist,
only grazing was enough to blow up the head.
(Matter of work pride for the guys...)

In the middle, there would be no head left...
same as a 30 odd eight and a moose's head,
if you shoot in the middle, you are left
with only the two loose antlers...

On the other hand, if you shoot
a big enough Allah...

How's that one:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v50/HOTSPUR666/CaptainMorganTrophy2.jpg

Posted by: Hotspur666 on January 11, 2005 07:39 PM

What is the difference between a "terrorist" and a sniper, exactly? Choise of weapon, it seems. The sniper seems more cowardly fwiw.

Posted by: Scott on January 11, 2005 08:41 PM

Scott : a sniper follows ROE (rules of engagement) and eliminates only legal targets defined in the ROE.
A terrorist on the other hand has no ROE and as such attacks anything (military OR civilian) with impunity.

Scott, can you please explain to me how it is cowardly to kill someone who is hellbent on killing you and anyone else who gets in the way?

Lest we not forget that terrorists want to kill not just military people, but americans as a whole. Plus they'll kill their own fellow muslims.

I'm a fairly liberal person serving in the Service (ironic, eh?), but I love reading GOC because he tells my less intelligent liberal constituants to shut the fuck up and be happy that someone else puts their life on their line so you don't have to.

Posted by: JJ on January 11, 2005 09:04 PM

HEAD SHOT

Posted by: Rebelfish on January 11, 2005 09:10 PM

Scott = safe and warm in his mommy's basement, having never had a job or responsibility or care in the world except for global warming and unrestricted access to porn in libraries. AKA asshat.

Posted by: Patrick on January 11, 2005 09:12 PM

Not hooah, OOOORAH.

Just last week a young Marine sniper logged a 2,300 meter kill. Not quite equal to Gunny Hathcock's 2,600 meter one-shot-kill, but still good marksmanship by a motivated, well-trained Marine!

Semper Fi,
Rag Heads Die.

Posted by: utopiatex on January 11, 2005 09:31 PM

Kim - Could of been one of the two snipers you've been sponsoring.

Scott- The dude wanted to die as evidenced by the bomb belt. One of our snipers just gave him his wish and kept him from taking people with him. If you have a problem with that you are a booger eatin' moh-ron.

Posted by: denny on January 11, 2005 09:43 PM

Like those shoes.

Posted by: Bill M on January 11, 2005 09:58 PM

While the second photo could very well be a .50BMG headshot, and the first photo is clearly a Barrett, the background in the first photo looks nothing like Iraq, and I'd surmise that these two photos have nothing to do with each other.

Posted by: Phanatic on January 11, 2005 10:04 PM

If the circumstances were reversed, if the 1st picture showed someone other than an American & the second showed the son of an Omaha NE Mother, I'm willing to bet you'd be screaming bloody-murder.

We know absolutely nothing about that dead fellow, yet we have no compunction about making sport of his dead, dead body.

That belt around the abdomen of the corpse ..... are you sure it's a dynamite suicide belt? Could it possibly be magazines for an AK? And the KFOR markings .. isn't that Bosnia troops?

That second picture is nothing short of obscene.

So, let me get it straight & right: it's OK for us to exploit the dead but if the enemy does it, it's merely a mark of how savage, ruthless, godless and ignorant those savages are? We are allowed to see the dead enemy with head split apart by a single shot but are not allowed to see the reverent handling of American coffins at Dover?

Make no mistake; I am not apologizing for anything an American sniper does in the course of battle.

But I have to wonder if a dual-standard is not at work when we can deliberate & debate the relative-caliber of the weapon that took this fellow out and are proscribed from seeing how OUR heroes died.

Of course, I'm still in VA therapy all these years later from seeing almost the exact-same images first hand back in Quang Nam province in 1969; except then, it was the American Marine that looked like the second picture. Twice, it was the fellow right next to me.

I waited almost three days to respond to that disturbing image; it was not my heart that was faint: it was my essence, my soul, my very being.

One thing that comes through to me when reading here, one thing that I have so much trouble with is this: it seems that it is a kill-or-be-killed world here. While I want no change on your part, I'd like to know if that is an accurate assessment. Yes, you are correct in that I am on various happy-pills from VA for various reasons, but is there no sense of 'what goes round, comes round' when it comes to posting such pictures?

Sometimes I cry in my frustration in that I'm no longer the 'duty, Country, Corps' Marine I once was, but I did not let THEM down ......

Posted by: Dan S on January 12, 2005 12:48 AM

Virgin's? what virgins?, said St Pete when this garbage got to heaven's gate.

Posted by: SGT SUNSHINE on January 12, 2005 01:10 AM

send this shooter after Bin Fucking Laden, but have him aim for his nuts and then hang the coward.

Posted by: brian on January 12, 2005 01:39 AM

AS for scott.......fuck him and feed him beans.

Yeah, the guy is so brave to be on his way to blow up some wimmen and chirren.

Remember......there are enemy snipers trying to take out our shooter......He's not sitting in an air conditioned office.

Why do I bother.......scott is on pot!

Posted by: wes jackson on January 12, 2005 03:33 AM

I dont think this guy was at heavens gate he went the other way

Posted by: Pharaoh on January 12, 2005 04:43 AM

Hey Dan,
Even if those were mag pouches for an AK, does it make it any less right? The guy is a terrorist, plain and simple. He is not wearing a uniform of any nation nor any know militia.
We don't get pissed about our boys who are killed in combat fighting a legitimate enemy, one who wears a uniform and fights like a man. We accept that men are going to die in war, and some of them will be ours. We also don't get extremely upset when our soldiers are attacked by terrorists and die. We know that such things happen in war. covert ops, resistance fighters etc. are the norm. Our independence was won by them. Suicide bombers are something that makes our blood boil though. These guys are not out to attack our soldiers. They attack innocent men, women and children, people going about their own business, trying to make a living, trying to live safe normal lives in the middle of hell. They normally don't attack combatants, just innocent people. Why? because they are cowards. Yes, they die too, but there is nothing heroic about it. Their victims are the defenseless, and that's what gets us up in arms. that's why we cheer when one of them is shown, graphically splattered on the street.

Posted by: Jeremy on January 12, 2005 08:59 AM

Fuck you Scott. Delta is ready when you are.

Posted by: Reality on January 12, 2005 02:16 PM

I think a lot of people have been brain washed with this blanket definition of terrorism and how terrorists are inherently cowards because their actions don't follow "honorable" rules of engagement. So this whole idea of him being a terrorist "plain and simple" doesn't really wash with me. Also, it seams to be more of a term used by government to make right /wrong, good/evil distinctions between their own violence and that of the enemy.

These terrorists, emeny combatants, what ever you want to call them have an ideological (or political, religious) agenda that they are fighting for. In turn, they target anyone who is a member of the population that opposes them.

Posted by: Will on January 12, 2005 08:03 PM

Now, somebody who is "real good" with a weapon would have taken off his left nut before he hit the ground, .......... then turn around and high five all his buddies!

hehehe!!!

Love it, .................. damn those camel jocky bastards!!!

Posted by: M.B. on January 12, 2005 09:18 PM

Will, I'm not talking about honorable rules of engagement, I'm talking about international conventions that we and most nations have signed, called the Geneva accords. Under these laws, all combatants must wear a uniform. And FYI, the german soldiers who put civies on over their uniforms while infiltrating and were caught, were executed, not imprisoned. Our pilots, who were caught by the Nazis escaping and not in uniform were shot also.
Rebles must declare a uniform or distinctive badge to show who and what they are.

Posted by: Jeremy on January 12, 2005 09:41 PM

First off, the Geneva Accord is a plan divvying up the West Bank in regards Israeli-Palestinian conflict; I think you mean the various Geneva conventions. And more often than anything else, they've been used by the US to classify a majority of the people we're fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq as "unlawful combatants" and therefore not entitled to the protections of the Geneva conventions. The US is currently also looking to fudge some of the existing points of the conventions in regards to holding pow's and what exactly constitutes torture. Geneva conventions aside, I don't recall any rebel uprisings ever following their guidelines.

Bottom line, terrorism is a relativist term for the violence committed by an enemy, from the point of view of who he's attacking. How exactly do you think the majority of the people in Iraq view the US there?

Posted by: Will on January 12, 2005 10:55 PM

Is Scott blowing Will, or vice versa?

Posted by: ha on January 12, 2005 11:04 PM

I SO appreciate people like "ha" contributing to the conversation. Brilliant retort!

Posted by: Dave-NC on January 12, 2005 11:29 PM

Thanks for the meaningful contribution ha :). Your comment demonstrates your capacity at intelligent discussion...

Posted by: Will on January 13, 2005 12:04 AM

You poor liberal bastard. Guess what? Kerry lost. Get over it.

Posted by: Poor Will on January 13, 2005 01:45 AM

Will,
Just so you know, there are over 100 treaties known as Geneva accords. The one I was refering to is the one best known, Geneva Convention (III) Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War; August 12, 1949.
Here is an excert from it:

(2) Members of other militias and members of other volunteer corps, including those of organized resistance movements, belonging to a Party to the conflict and operating in or outside their own territory, even if this territory is occupied, provided that such militias or volunteer corps, including such organized resistance movements, fulfil the following conditions: (a) that of being commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates; (b) that of having a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance; (c) that of carrying arms openly; (d) that of conducting their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war.

As you can see, it requires a distinctive sign be worn by militias to be recognized as such. As to your comment regarding rebel uprisings, that wold deal with internal only laws of the nation involved. Most of the terrorists we are dealing with in Iraq, Kosovo etc are not residents or citizens of the occupied nation. Most of hte members of AQ captured in Afghanistan were Saudi or UAE citizens. When an uprising is strictly internal ie; citizens of Liberia attacking the Liberian Government, the Geneva accords would not apply. But when they attack an occupying power, they become subject to the Geneva accords if the nations are both signatories of the treaty. As such, all combatants fighting in Iraq, or Kosovo are subject to the Geneva accords. Therefore, anyone wearing civies, and participating in combat related actions is a war criminal. Most of the detainees at Gitmo, and AbuGarib are not subject to the Protection of the Geneva accords because they were not wearing any type of uniform when they were caught, therefore not entitled to POW status.

Posted by: Jeremy on January 13, 2005 05:39 AM

For all of you debating if this was .50 Caliber, based on the damage, The amount of damage is going to change drastically based on the projectile. A Full Metal Jacket will produce this type of damage, whereas a partially jacketed projectile would do MUCH more damage.

FYI

Posted by: Beaux on January 13, 2005 08:04 AM

OUTSTANDING!! Keep up the good work.

Posted by: Bob on January 14, 2005 06:58 AM

Only shows me that fifty more American troops will be be-headed after we kidnap them. Only this time we'll torture them more before they neet their evil God.

Go to Hell all you American scum. We will rape your daughters before killing them.

Ha ha ha.

Question: Why have you not "won" your war against terror like your drunken president claimed you have (two years ago)? Because you are not too intelligent and the only intelligence you depend on is always shown to be false?

Again...Ha ha ha.

Posted by: Abhuud on January 14, 2005 09:24 AM

Hey you goat fucking camel jockey, with the fake arabic name. Why don't you just go back to what ever country you're pathetic goat hearding smelly assed family came from and decide if you like living in the ole' USA better.

I don't have to like what the govenment does but because I live in the US i love the US and stand by her decisions. And to answer your question about why we haven't won the war on Terror is because you little rat basturds keep hiding in the fucking mountains like cowards. Think for one minute with all the tech, intel and research that we have our disposal, we could easily run the world if we took the cowardice stand like you little candy asses do.

If we wanted to we would never have to pay for oil, we would stop feeding the world and you inbread ingrates would all get shipped home in a little box. But we as a democracy have the power and kindness to give to help others. Just remeber that we let you into the USA.

Posted by: ballsack on January 14, 2005 10:46 AM

Ha ha ha.

Why is it you can not find Bin Laden or win in Iraq?

It's because you are simple-minded high-dollar chicken shits. All the weapons and all the king's men, remember, could not put Humpty Dumpty together again!! Ha.

Why did the Mosques all survive the Tsunami? Hmm.

I guess it's just tactic, because we know how to fight...we kicked the Soviet Union's ass and we can most certainly kick yours. Evidenced by the daily losses in Iraq, and now you have to have a draft because your own military is nothing but untrained idiotic part-timing fools who think if they sign-up, they don't have to go to war and get free college. Right.

I remember your chicken-hearted draft dodging president (who can't spell or talk) saying "combat operations are over" two years ago. What's the matter? You weak or what?

I'd say weak. Look at your T.V. shows, your economy, and your murder rates at the middle schools. Eat it raw you white trash Jerry Springer Jew lover. We will win. And you just lost your civil liberties. Ha ha ha.

Terror level yellow, as in chicken shit.

Ha ha ha.

Wanna place some bets on who wins in Iraq?

Posted by: Abhuud on January 14, 2005 06:21 PM

Ha ha ha.

Why is it you can not find Bin Laden or win in Iraq?

It's because you are simple-minded high-dollar chicken shits. All the weapons and all the king's men, remember, could not put Humpty Dumpty together again!! Ha.

Why did the Mosques all survive the Tsunami? Hmm.

I guess it's just tactic, because we know how to fight...we kicked the Soviet Union's ass and we can most certainly kick yours. Evidenced by the daily losses in Iraq, and now you have to have a draft because your own military is nothing but untrained idiotic part-timing fools who think if they sign-up, they don't have to go to war and get free college. Right.

I remember your chicken-hearted draft dodging president (who can't spell or talk) saying "combat operations are over" two years ago. What's the matter? You weak or what?

I'd say weak. Look at your T.V. shows, your economy, and your murder rates at the middle schools. Eat it raw you white trash Jerry Springer Jew lover. We will win. And you just lost your civil liberties. Ha ha ha.

Terror level yellow, as in chicken shit.

Ha ha ha.

Wanna place some bets on who wins in Iraq?

Posted by: Abhuud on January 14, 2005 06:21 PM

Abhuud: Why have you not "won" your war against terror like your drunken president claimed you have (two years ago)? Because you are not too intelligent and the only intelligence you depend on is always shown to be false?

If we had followed Muslim rules of engagement using American weaponry - i.e. rape all, burn all and kill all, we would undoubtedly have won already. But we're Americans, not Muslims - unlike Muslims, we don't do jihads.

Posted by: Zhang Fei on January 14, 2005 06:28 PM

Abhuud: I guess it's just tactic, because we know how to fight...we kicked the Soviet Union's ass and we can most certainly kick yours.

Actually, the Soviet Union kicked your ass. You lost 1 million people - they lost 13,000. If Muslims win any more victories like this, there won't be many more Muslims left.

Posted by: Zhang Fei on January 14, 2005 06:30 PM

You are not understanding my good foreign friend, has the U.S. checked up on your immigrant status?

We won in Afghanistan, they left. The knowledge of torture you also seem to have perfected, along with your napalm and your worthless loss in Viet Nam. It takes no body counts, something you know about (i.e.: Fullujah) to be a victor. More than half of your citizens are against the war and it's precursor lies of WMD's in Iraq, it's only a matter of time those half of your fat population feel the losses and react accordingly, just like Viet Nam.

Death fighting Americans means salvation and eternal life, almost like your fake churches demanding money from it's perishoner's in order to elevate to Heaven, only more so. The highest honor a Muslim can contribute is to take Americans with him in death. Fight that you Jew lovers and still if that's not enough...China will dance on your graves.

Congress, White House, and the courts...all lies and only idiots believe them, thus your status is clear.

You think your troops will support your fat parasitic lifestyles forever? You cut their benefits, force them to remain beyond enlistments, and care not for them after their honorable servitude. Your records prove it, your rhetoric only a bumpersticker.

Send more troops, like your draft-dodging president..."Bring 'em on". Send Jessica Lynch, your "hero" back too, she "emptied her clip" remember? That was until she herself talked to the press. A nation relying on lies. They don't last long. You won't last long.

Take a Clariton, it's good for you.

Posted by: Abhuud on January 14, 2005 09:04 PM

Holy shit! We got us a dumb camel fucking Islamic troll. Hey troll are you jealous that we have the highest standard of living in the world while you live in a third world hellhole? Who just won in Afghanistan fuckface? And you goat fuckers are so brave that you have to hide your faces. Your women are so ugly that they have to hide their faces. Big brave Muslim warriors. You can only win against women and children. We've lost less than 1400 men. How many of your "brave warriors" have bitten the dust fuckhead. Go scurry away and hide like the cockroach you are you Islamic pig. I'm sorry. I just insulted a pig. Pigs and dogs are higher on the evolutionary scale than are Muslims. You obviously haven't read the rules of this site. If you cannot come up with better insults, I will start playing whack a troll with you. Allah sucks! Mohammed was a pedophile.

Posted by: denny on January 14, 2005 10:35 PM

Have you noticed that there are fewer suicide bombers now that Arafat is dead? Rummor has it that young boys were offered two choices when they joined the PLO, Suicide bomber, or sleep with Arafat. The smart ones chose suicide.
Actually, its easy to understand why they do not value life.
1. Women who NEED the Burka.
2. All your meals consist of goat cooked over camel dung.
3. No BBQ.
4. No pork chops
5. Can only eat with your right hand since you wipe with your left hand.
I know the list is a lot longer, but you al lget the picture. Allah akbar in Hebrew means god is a mouse.

Posted by: Jeremy on January 15, 2005 09:14 AM

That is awesome!!!!!!!! Anyone got a scraper?

Posted by: Maximum™ on January 16, 2005 06:20 PM

That Abhuud guy sounds pretty militant, but look at the idiots slamming him. I myself have to think that most Americans are like that fat ugly chick who is going on trial for torturing prisoners. Man is she appalling or what? Of course most Bubba-Americans love trailer trash like her. Wonder what color her baby is going to be? Probably will get a job at WalMart when she serves her prison sentence and become another idiot American on welfare, like most of 'em are.

He's also got a point concerning Bin Laden, seems that camel jockey is a lot smarter than Bush and all his draft dodging cabinet. I'd bet money on Bin Laden winning this whole bullshit war on terror. America doesn't have the balls to keep a war going, again this muslim fanatic seems right about that. Let's bet on a winner here, and it's not going to be America.

Posted by: Sanchez on January 16, 2005 09:57 PM

Sanchez - Are you an illegal immigrant? America losing? In your dreams, dickhead. As long as we we can keep the Dimocrats out of power we'll win.

Posted by: denny on January 16, 2005 10:31 PM

Yeah, we're losing the war on terror. That's why all the brave jihadist are running and hiding like little girls.

If your God is so powerful, stand and fight, surely your God will protect you and strike down the infidels.

Any time. We are there and waiting.

Cowards.

Posted by: Beaux on January 17, 2005 08:33 AM

Read what you write and think about what you're saying idiot.

It does not matter how "chiken shit" or whatever the Jihadists are in context to their "hiding in caves" or how they fight. War is war you numbnutz, and in spite of all the weapons and "rules" you think we've got, why hasn't the outcome so far done anything instead of create more enemies? Still can't find Bin Laden, now that's hilarious in the eyes of the world!!

Man you are stupid. Just like the "cake walk" the lying president Bush promised it would be by going into Iraq to find and destroy "all the WMD's".

I hate Islamic extremeists, but evidently the right-wing American's are nothing different. Both are stupid fanatics and the best results in this made-up war would be for them to all destroy each other completely. No more idiotic Jessica Lynch bullshit and no more Bin Laden crap!

By the way, I'm American. Fought for her too, you didn't.

Posted by: Sanchez on January 17, 2005 08:43 AM

Talk about a guilty Consience.

I was simply addressing an idiot with a little banter.

However, here you come insulting me. I am sorry if you can't grasp the intent of my message but don't call me stupid because you mis-qued.

Your response if full of crap. Comparing ANY wing of American Citizenry to Islamic terrorists shows just how twisted your ideals really are.

I don't recall any of right-wing Americans video taping beheadings in order to get publicity. I don't know of any training camps in the US for homicide bombers.

Maybe you should re-read the first line of your post and just reflect on that for awhile.

Posted by: Beaux on January 17, 2005 09:12 AM

Sanchez - If you're referring to me, U.S. Navy 1965-1969. Lot of the time in Viet Nam. I see you're parroting the "where is bin Laden" line of the moonbat wing of the Dimocrat Party. Who gives a fuck? What has bin Laden done since 9/11? How many terrorist attacks on U.S. soil? Hmmmm? He's hiding in a cave somewhere scared shitless. Meanwhile we have overthrown two gummints with relatively light casualties and no matter how you try to spin 1300 dead as a huge amount of casualties you are dead wrong. In spite of what the lamestream media would have us believe Fallujah was a success. How many insurgents have we killed? A whole shitload more than 1300.

Posted by: denny on January 17, 2005 11:51 AM

Denny's right. I am a moonbat and an idiot. Plus I am an illegal immigrant with an 8th grade education.

Posted by: Sanchez on January 17, 2005 11:51 AM

Let me say if the US military would just read a book called "Tactics Of The Crescent Moon" Militant Muslim Combat Methods, by H. John Poole, they might just begin to understand how the Muslims think and how they wage war. Remember knowing your enemy if the first step to defeating them. I have given all my men a copy of this book before they enter any conflict having the potential to come against Muslim combatants,,it is very good to bring insight and may just be helpful in saving the soldiers life.

Oh an very nice shot, in a kill or be killed environment.

Posted by: GiJoe on January 20, 2005 02:43 AM

Abhuud - with a goal to be a marine corps sniper I just pray to the real God that I get a chance to put your fucking ass on a website like this. Semper Fi.

Posted by: Kelly on January 20, 2005 09:17 PM

THE WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION. THE FACT IS NOW EXPOSED. THESE RAG HEADS REALLY DO HAVE BRAINS AND THEY ARE GOOD FOR SOME THINGS. STREET PAVING, RED CAUTION WARNINGS, HUMVE TRACTION COATING, AND MOST OF ALL TO SHOW ANY ONE WHO FUCKS WITH AMERICA THAT MEETING HIS MAKER IS EASYER THAN YOU THINK. OH BY THE WAY I LIKE THE NEW TENNIS SHOES HE IS WEARING. THAT MUST HAVE BEEN HIS PAYMENT FOR JOB WELL DONE. THE SHOOTER NEEDS MORE AMMO.

Posted by: RAY on January 21, 2005 10:28 PM

Good work sniper. Keep it up. Hopefully, we can have a few more of those assholes denied their 72 virgins while the liberals cry: WAAAAA WAAAAAA WAAAAAAAA HOW TERRIBLE!!!!!!!!! It's fine for them to blow up a bus load of school children, but not fine for one of America's Finest to take care of the business of trying to keep us safe. Again, my hat is off to the sniper. Kill a few more of those pieces of shit.

Posted by: Chip on January 29, 2005 06:21 AM

ALL I CAN SAY IS THAT IS A FUCKING OUTSTANDING PHOTO OOOFUCKINGRAH
i say we just go and shoot every one above 6 months old i dont think we should externamate their whole race but kill all the fucking radical morons who can't seem to do anything productive shy of killing themselves and there fellow countrymen. so if iraq is to have a future just save the 6 month olds and younger and genocide the rest. its either that or we make the worlds biggest peice of glass semper fi

Posted by: Jason on February 1, 2005 09:02 PM

Keep on, but celebrating like this is what the terrorists do. We are professional soldiers. Hooyah.

Posted by: Shadow on February 2, 2005 09:24 AM

Abuud... question for you... have you not seen the above photo? We can arrange for him to make his rounds toward the cave you are hiding in.

Posted by: SHADOW on February 2, 2005 09:34 AM

Glad to see they don't have to use Rubber Bullets anymore!!

God Bless and Stay Ready!!

Part of the American Tribe
Squirrel Hunter
Spider Killer
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and ALL who Fight with her give them Strength, Wisdom, Sight, and Courage to stay the course to Destroy ALL islamic Terrorist and ALL who Support them Amen

Posted by: Catherine Schwob on February 3, 2005 05:40 PM

Abhuud,

I know you folks hate us Jews and all Americans in general, but I think I can straighten-out one issue that creates our differences.

Some of the posts have referred to your people as "Rag Heads" and that may be offensive since those are NOT rags, but, in fact, sheets.

I ask, then, that all Americans please discontinue referring to your countrymen as "Rag Heads" and start say "Sheet Heads" so that we are more accurate in addressing your countrymen.

Posted by: Jewboy on February 5, 2005 12:30 PM

Good Job Soldier...Keep up the good work

Posted by: Timmy Lewis on February 5, 2005 01:26 PM

Good Job Soldier...Keep up the good work

Posted by: Timmy Lewis on February 5, 2005 01:26 PM

Good Job Soldier...Keep up the good work

Posted by: Timmy Lewis on February 5, 2005 01:26 PM

SCOTT>>>>>>>. WHERE WEAR YOU ,THAT SEPT MORNING???

IT APPEARS ,U "Can't Understand Normal Tactics " UPOS

Posted by: BALBOA on February 7, 2005 10:45 PM

I wonder why over 2 billion muslims are so terribly afraid of a few million jews. guess they are afraid the Jews god is the corect and only god.makes them all wrong .

Posted by: 50cal owner on February 9, 2005 08:51 PM

I would just like to say to any person like Abhuud: If you live in America-please do the rest of the hard-working citizens a favor and shoot yourself. Notice i said hard working, i will admit, many people take for granted the benefits of our Democracy. I voted for the first time this past November and it was one of the greatest feelings in my life, and now to know that people are also doing this for the first time in their life makes me proud to be an American. I am not in the military or army or anything of the such. But I will say this: God(and yes there is only one) bless every man and woman serving this great country. I would like to say to them that there is at least one more back here at home standing behind them. I just wish that there were more people like Abhuud standing in view of these brave soldiers so these men and women can get more target practice for when they do find Bin-Laden.

Posted by: Will on February 10, 2005 10:52 PM

USA will fight for Israel because we tell them to! They are our friends.

Posted by: Sol on February 11, 2005 08:59 AM

thats pretty cool!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: joe big on February 15, 2005 10:41 AM

does anyone else have anymore pics like the one shown?????????????

Posted by: joe big on February 15, 2005 10:45 AM

I am the daughter of a, now retired, Navy Chief. All my life I've been proud to be an American. This is a very gory picture. But war is not pretty. I'm VERY PROUD of all the American military men and women in all the military forces fighting the good fight. Keep it up. Stay safe. May God be with you.

Posted by: BAF on February 27, 2005 10:42 PM

Just goes to show what a well-trained Marine and his rifle can do in this world!! I know a good number of active/inactive Marines, and the duty they have given for this country allows us to live in a great country, such as this. Though I am a liberal Californian, I share some conservative views, especially when it comes to upholding our stance as a country you DONT FUCK WITH! Though I am glad that Saddam is finally out of power, I do feel for all the families that have lost someone in the war. I wish that our troops didnt have to continue their presence in Iraq.

I have read the above blogs, and I can only say that I feel we are trying to fight fair against a "dirty" enemy. Being that our troops are bound by the ROE, they CANNOT randomly blow things up and shoot people. Considering that we have followed ROE and the Islamic militants haven't, you would think that we would be losing the war... BUT WE AREN'T!! For our 1300+ troops killed, how many tens of thousands of militants have been silenced. I think that is a pretty good kill ratio considering we STAND AND FIGHT, not BOMB AND HIDE!

Too bad that a Hiroshima-like event is just not an option for our current times, cuz that would shut them up! Those places are already deserts anyways!

Posted by: UCLA Fan on March 2, 2005 05:20 PM
Post a comment