Jeremy posted the following on my Just Like Christianity post.
As an atheist, how do you justify you moral position? If there is no God, no great law giver, what makes your opinion any better than Tara's? What makes the actions of the Muslims wrong if there is no God? If all we are is mutated pond scum, there is no basis for any form of morality, and the only law is survival of the strongest. I agree with most of what you post by the way, and in no way am attempting to disagree with you on your positions.
Now that is a very good question. What is my basis for morality? Wow! I could write an incredibly long essay about that and about the influence of religion on Western philosophy.
Not really. I've knocked back two Stolys on the rocks and a half bottle of wine (Oh God! Dan is gonna accuse me of having a drinking problem.) so I'll have to give an abbreviated version.
Religion has always fascinated me. What's amazing is that the three major monotheistic religions all came from the Middle East and were created by Semites. What? You didn't know that the Arabs are Semites? Yep! They are the same race as the Jews. Their laws are similar. Neither are supposed to eat pork. They both practice circumcision. Of course Judaism has mellowed. They don't stone people for adultry. Plus, Jewish women have rights and are not property.
So did God create man or did man create God? Reading the Bible we see the early God as a warlike being, very stern. That's because the early Hebrews were a nomadic people and life was harsh. As one works his way through the Bible, God mellows out. The Hebrews settled in cities and life became less harsh as did God.
The Allah of Islam is a harsh God because the Arabs were a desert, nomadic people and life was harsh in the desert. Unfortunately, Islam, at least the Islam practiced in Saudi Arabia, which just happens to be the center of Islamic thought (What is one of the five pillars of Islam? The Haj. All the Muslims have to go to Mecca at least once in their life.), is the harsh version. Women have no rights. If you commit adultry you get stoned. The EUnichs are quick to condemn the United States for capital punishment. What about Saudi Arabia where they practice beheading and stoning? And we're the bad guys?
But back to morality. Do I need an all powerful being looking over my shoulder to make me do right? Nope. I don't.
One of the definitions of character is what you do when no one is looking. We all have learned about Bill Clinton's character. And what about Al Gore? As he was castigating Republicans for not caring, we found out that he gave less to charity than my mother who was living on Social Security and some modest investments. After having to make his tax returns public, he upped his charitable contributions.
My morality comes from my upbringing and common sense. I have a conscience. I don't need a father figure looking over my shoulder because, for all of my father's weaknesses (He was an alcoholic.), he and my mother did instill in me a sense of right and wrong.
I do not need an all powerful being looking over my shoulder to tell me that murder is wrong. Likewise, boinking my neighbor's wife is taboo. Same with stealing.
I was married once. I did not cheat on my wife even tho' I had countless opportunities. I was in the Navy and the prostitutes in the WestPac ports would give married men a discount or do it for free. They considered married men a challenge. Too bad my wife did not have the same morality that I did. My one regret after the divorce was that I did not keep my wedding ring.
One does not need a God to decide what is right or wrong. That is what civilization is all about. In early civilizations, religion was required to determine what was right or wrong. But the Greeks and Romans had gods they worshipped, but they were a nation of laws. Reading their mythology, you certainly did not want to emulate their gods. Jupiter/Zeus was the Bill Clinton of the Roman/Greek pantheon. He was always sneaking around on Juno/Hera/Hillary.
Yeah, religion was a good basis for morality, but it is not required. We are a nation that was founded on Judeo-Christian concepts, but we are not a theocracy, and I fervently hope that we never become one. We are a nation of laws.
One does not need religion to determine right from wrong. Look at all the people who have been killed in the name of religion. I am not trying to denigrate religion, except the virulent forms of religion (and this includes both Christianity and Islam) that thinks it is OK to kill because their particular deity has, in the words of their leaders, said that this is what their deity has commanded. I cannot comprehend of a deity who loves humanity who would tell his followers to kill other people just because they didn't worship him. What kind of being would want that from his followers? What kind of religion would teach that?
I once asked a Christian the following question. I'm sure I could have posed the same question to a Muslim and got a similar answer.
Suppose we have two people. One is a paragon of virtue. He is kind to others. He is charitable. He does not believe in God, but has obeyed all his laws, with the exception of the religious stuff. We have another person who is not a very nice guy. He has committed adultry. He has been a thief. But, at the end of his life he has repented and has found Christ (or Mohammed). Which person deserves to go to heaven. My Christian friend said that the only way to heaven is through Jesus Christ. I'm sure a Muslim would have a similar answer.
Y'see, I don't believe in God, but at the same time I cannot comprehend of a god that would be so petty as to refuse to allow a really good person to enter heaven just because he didn't believe in Him.
And that's my morality.
"Semitic" isn't a racial distinction - it's a term used to mark a linguistic connection.
Spanish and Italian are similar languages, but there is no Italian-Spanish "race."
I beg to differ. Semitic is a racial designation just like Hamitic, which were the ancient Egyptians, unless, of course, things have changed since my high school ancient history. That wouldn't surprise me with the dumbing down of education.
Posted by: Denny on July 13, 2005 11:33 PMRegarding your great question, Even the most moral person is still sinful in the eyes of a perfect God. Its a sad thought given the great acts we have seen done by pagans. Our only hope is that God is Merciful and Just. I remember the words of Ghandi regarding Christianity. The only fault he found with the religion were its followers.
What I was attempting to ask was how you can impose your morality on others, or advocate doing so. Even Jeffery Dahlmer had a moral compass, his was severely skewered. I think Swimmers compass is off a few clicks as well, given that he has no remorse about leaving a young girl to drown while he tried to protect his (car)rear.
I posed the question to you because I knew I would get a reasoned response. If I were to ask it on a message board, it would turn into the usual attacks and name calling.
I'm sure it does amaze people to learn that Jews and Arabs are related. Abram came from Ur in present day Iraq. His son Ishmael fathered many tribes, and his nephew Lot fathered the Moabites and Ammonites. These tribes became the arch enemies of Israel when they returned to Caanan.
According to the Bible, Abram was only a few generations removed from Noah, who is supposed to be the common link for all the people on earth.
Good night Denny, and thanks for the thoughts.
Jeremy - I am not trying to impose my morality on others. I only state opinions. Of course, I think my opinions are always right.
Posted by: Denny on July 13, 2005 11:41 PMYes, Most wars are due to religion,....I just gotta say,...Your rant made me sad,...for you,...to have no faith at all,...Tell me?,..What do you believe in??? PS2?
Posted by: Teresa on July 14, 2005 12:06 AMFUCK!!!!!!
I just wrote my best-ever well-balanced response to this post and fucking COMCAST lost the son of a bitch!!!!
FUCK!
Now I have to come back again TOMORROW! Just like the LAST 672 times!
Curse you! ::)))))))
Posted by: Dan S. on July 14, 2005 01:27 AMI think the Muslims believe that good works get you in door anyway very good post Denny
Posted by: Pharaoh on July 14, 2005 04:40 AMhttp://iraqnow.blogspot.com/2005/04/face-that-haunts-me.html
Posted by: Jon on July 14, 2005 06:15 AMYour words "But back to morality. Do I need an all powerful being looking over my shoulder to make me do right? Nope. I don't."
After that statement, do you think that you are made in God's image?
Joseph
Posted by: Joseph on July 14, 2005 07:03 AMDan: Any long post, write in Notepad or something first, then paste it into the comment box when you're ready to publish. That way you don't lose it unless your comp freezes.
Posted by: Rick C on July 14, 2005 09:11 AMDamn you do a helluva good job writing what I think. I agree on this, Just Like Christianity, your retorts to Tara. When I find something we radically disagree on then we can have a knock down, drag out discourse. But for fun, let's take it out on someone we both hate.
Posted by: TomR on July 14, 2005 10:25 AM"Do I need an all powerful being looking over my shoulder to make me do right? Nope. I don't."
Neither do I. As far as "all-powerful" goes, can an all-powerful being create another being who is more powerful than itself?
I'm saddened to see that, still, to this day, good people are being killed because they refuse to succumb to the same mental disorders as the killers. Isn't it time we all just grew up and started behaving ourselves, making the world a better place, just because it's the right thing to do?
Posted by: Jeannette on July 14, 2005 10:40 AMJoseph - How can I think of myself as made in God's image when I don't believe in God?
Posted by: Denny on July 14, 2005 11:50 AMExcellent! Quite possibly the most astute, intelligent post I've read in a looooong time. Besides that, it mirrors my thoughts, exactly...it always helps when you agree with me. hehe
Good job.
Shit! wish I had known about the hookers giving freebies to married guys when I was in WESPAC as a Marine. I would have made a very wise investment in a cheap wedding band.
Posted by: Ric on July 14, 2005 01:24 PMJust as an aside, know who the ONLY person is that is guaranteed to be in Heaven?
............
........
.....
...
The Good Thief. ("This day, Thou shalt be with Me in Paradise").
Posted by: Dan S. on July 14, 2005 01:57 PMInstead of asking how a God could be so petty to refuse a really good person, you might ask yourself how a God could be so merciful to allow such a sinner into heaven...hhmmm???
As a Catholic Christian I am taught that God sends no one to hell. This is a choice we make ourselves. So...don't go blaming a person's choice on God.
Also, this faith we have is not based just on heaven or hell. It is based on a life where God is active, where He is THERE, where He is guiding, and most of all...where he is LOVING us.
This mountain called life is a tough climb. We can try and climb ourselves and get bruised and battered, or we can hold the hand of the One who wants us to make it up the mountain more than we even do, and even though we may still get bruised we are also soothed and comforted knowing that if we fall we will be carried to the top.
* I will now pass the collection plate...;-)
Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on July 14, 2005 03:19 PMRightwingsparkle - So in your belief system does that mean that Ghandi wouldn't get to go to heaven? Howza 'bout Hindus and Buddhists? I'm not trying to badmouth your religion, but what kind of God would keep good people, who never even had the opportunity to be Christians, out of heaven? Hmmmm? That was one of the things that turned me off to Catholicism. I was raised as a Catholic, By the way.
Teresa - I believe in myself. I truly envy people who have faith that there is a superior being watching over us but I have found that I can live without it.
Posted by: Denny on July 14, 2005 05:28 PMDenny,
Actually Catholism is the only Christian religion that teaches that other religions CAN go to heaven. THAT is one of the reasons I am a Catholic. I was raised Baptist and became a convert at 24. In my RCIA classes I was listening to a tape by Bishop Fulton Sheen where he said that the Catholic Church teaches that good and holy men and women of other religions who loved God may not know Christ by name, but when they die, they will know him by sight. In other words, Christ was the way the truth and the life (not just a name). The common thread among those who love God, by whatever name they call him, is goodness, kindness, love and forgiveness. That made so much sense to me that I decided to become Catholic right there and then.
Maybe they didn't teach you the most important things.....;-)
>>>I'm saddened to see that, still, to this day, good people are being killed ... making the world a better place, just because it's the right thing to do?
Posted by: Jeremy on July 15, 2005 01:49 PMMost of my comment didn't post, and I don't have time to redo it now.
Posted by: Jeremy on July 15, 2005 01:50 PMDenny, you are wrong wrong wrong about your "semite is a race" theory.
I have red hair, green eyes and ivory skin with freckles. My grandmother on my mother's side had blonde hair and blue eyes and my grandfather on my dad's side had carrot red hair and coloring like me.
If you and I stood together in a room and invited onlookers to play a game of "guess the semite" I bet they would pick you! :)
If you are at all interested, I'd be glad to hunt down some web pages to support my case.
Sharon
Posted by: Sharon on July 15, 2005 04:17 PMI believe that the Semites were decendants of Shem, one of Noahs sons. So, I guess that would make them a tribe of a larger people/race.
Posted by: GrampaChris on July 15, 2005 05:55 PMA question that comes to my mind is this: If there is a God of the sort in the bible, Quran, etc. , why do we need to be told about it? Wouldn't God make his existence known to man instinctively? No one has to tell us to eat or drink, why do we need to be educated about the existence of God? If man is involved the chance for corruption is high. Why would God leave it to man?
Posted by: GrampaChris on July 15, 2005 06:10 PMSharon - Sigh! I hate to have to point out what you as a Jew should know. This is just another example of poor education. Please don't try to argue ancient history with me. I obviously know more than you do. I'm not saying you are stupid, just that you lack knowledge of ancient Middle Eastern history. My Semite is a race theory is not a theory, it is a fact. Grab a dictionary (or a decent ancient history of the Middle East).
From here
Semite - A member of a group of Semitic-speaking peoples of the Near East and northern Africa, including the Arabs, Arameans, Babylonians, Carthaginians, Ethiopians, Hebrews, and Phoenicians.
That is the first definition. The second definition is - A Jew.
You are obviously an Ashkenazi Jew and your forbears intermingled with Europeans. Remember, your Jewishness passes through your mother (Which always cracks me up that the Christians trace Joseph's lineage back to David, even though they believe Mary's conception was immaculate and Joseph wasn't the real father. Proof that the Gospels were written by Gentiles.). As long as your matrilineal line is Jewish, you are Jewish. Your father, or a male way back could have been Gentile, hence your red hair and green eyes. One of my best friends in college was a blond haired, blue eyed Jew. Also, people who are not Semites could have converted to Judaism, like the Ethiopean Jews who happen to be black.
See what you get for coming here? You get some knowledge that you didn't have before, from a goyem, no less.
Posted by: Denny on July 15, 2005 07:52 PMSharon, the languages of the Semite people are very similar. Arabic, Aramaic, Hebrew, very few diffrences. I am also partly Jewish, (yes Denny, on my mothers side, and my paternal Grandmothers side as well). My father was fluent in several languages, ten or more, including Hebrew and Aramaic. He used to delight in teasing the Jehovahs Witlesses by bringing out Biblical test in Greek, Latin, or what ever language they claimed was correct when ever they made their " thats not what it says in the Greek, etc" arguement. Semite is derived from Shem, one of the sons of Noah. For my part, I claim to be a descendent of a Turkish vine dresser. That explains why I like wine so much.
Posted by: Jeremy on July 15, 2005 08:50 PMAyn Rand spent a large number of hundreds of pages articulating an internally consistent, secular morality. Starting from the fact that our minds are our means of survival, that we must choose to use them, that each man is sovereign, she derived a complete morality that demands voluntary interactions as the norm of human affairs. It absolutely prohibits the exploitation of others, or the sacrifice of one’s self to the needs of others, as our leaders are demanding that we as a people do for the Kleptocracies of Africa.
God is neither necessary as an explanation of the world and its workings nor as a giver of morality, since morality derives from our nature as rational beings. The very concept of moral commandments is a contradiction in terms. Morality cannot be commanded as it derives from man’s nature.
Denny,
Since you insist on exercising the masculine prerogative - refusing to admit you are wrong, I will be forced to exercise the feminine prerogative - setting a man straight. :)
This article, by the eminent scholar Bernard Lewis debunks the false belief that “semitic” is a racial distinction.
“Serious scholars have pointed out . . . that "Semitic" is a linguistic and cultural classification . . . It has nothing whatever to do with race ...”
http://www.myjewishlearning.com/history_community/Modern/ModernIntergroup/ModernAntisemitism/Semites.htm
I think you are confusing "race" with "ethnicity."
BTW, Even though we disagree here, I really like your web page and read it often.
Sharon - You have your opinion and sources and I have my opinion and sources and never the twain shall meet. Of course, since this is my site, I'm right. Arabs and Sephardic Jews are of the same race.
Posted by: Denny on July 18, 2005 11:58 AMYou say ---
"Y'see, I don't believe in God, but ..."
I hate to pull a Slick Willy on you, but that all depends on what your definition of "God" is. You can't believe in the supremacy of the Law if you don't believe in the supremacy of the law-giver. You do believe in the law-giver (by my definition -- "God"). It's just that, as a rationalist, you've mistaken yourself for Him.
Bob
Posted by: Bob Williamson on July 20, 2005 10:38 AMBob - I believe that God was created by man to instill morality in mankind. Therefore man was the lawgiver. I do not have to believe in a supreme being for my morality. I do not believe "Thou shalt not kill" because it is one of the Ten Commandments. I believe it because I think it's wrong to take a life. I also don't believe I am God because I believe it. Your logic is way off.
Posted by: Denny on July 20, 2005 11:02 AMAs I understand your main objection to us religious folk, it's that we try to impose our morality on society.
But I must point out that it's not in my job description (as a Christian) to make you obey my rules (or even what I call "God's" rules). My calling is merely to warn you that you will give an account of your behavior to someone greater than yourself -- not to someone I created, but to the One who created you.
In contrast to my calling, your calling (as a rationalist) is to take an active roll in assuring that society adopts your definition of morality (as opposed to the views of Osama bin Laden). Who then is the fanatic, trying to impose his morality on others?
Since I mentioned our accountability to God, I must hasten to add that the verdict against all of us is the same: "All have sinned and come short of the glory of God; there is none righteous -- no, not even one." (Romans 3) This is true of all Christians, Jews, Muslims, Theists, Hindus, Rationalists, ... alike. We are all deserving of God's righteous wrath.
We may succeed in convincing ourselves that living up to our own definition of morality exempts us from our just deserts -- but I suspect that if you were all that convinced of your own righteousness, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Where Christianity parts with all other faiths is on the issue of "grace". Only Christianity teaches that we don't have to receive the justice we deserve. Christianity teaches that Jesus received that punishment for us and He now invites us to accept His forgivness for the torment we inflicted on Him.
Is that fair? HELL NO, it isn't fair! It's as unfair as it would be for your son to die defending the freedoms of a bunch of morally superior war protestors. If those hippies got what they really deserved, they'd be rotting in Abu Graib under the watchful eye of Saddam's guards.
So how do you figure God feels about our scorning the sacrifice of His Son? Is He "being petty" (as you put it) to let us self-described "really good" persons face the justice we deserve?
You see, "believing in Jesus" isn't a matter of gullibly accepting something that's patent foolishness; it's trusting in someone who has proved Himself trustworthy. It's your choice; you can trust in your own righteousness, or you can trust in Jesus'.
Bob
Bob - Once again you misunderstood me. I have no objection to you religious folk as long as you don't try to force your beliefs down my throat or kill me in God's name. I envy you your faith. But after saying that, I believe the Bible was written by man. You believe it is written by man at the direction of God. You believe that Christ died for our sins and the poor heathens who have not found Christ will not go to heaven. I fail to see how a compassionate God could condemn a whole group of people who have never even had the chance to find Christ. Once again, that is my belief. I do not force that belief upon others. I have no problem with you believing that as long as it does not affect me.
Posted by: Denny on July 20, 2005 03:53 PMAnd I can live with you being an "infidel". It saddens me, but you're accountable to God, not me.
Please note, this is also where Christianity and Islam part company:
The rejection of God's love moves followers of Christ to tears.
The rejection of Allah's law moves followers of Mohammed to kill.
Bob
Posted by: Bob Williamson on July 20, 2005 05:26 PM