Teresa asked why Georgians were so anti-Hillary. I gave her a list of reasons, so now it is my readers' turn to tell her why they dislike Hillary so much. Here's another reason I don't want to see her elected. The latest about 9/11 is that the CIA knew about Mohammed Atta and a few other of the 9/11 murderers back during the Clinton administration (I'm shocked!), but thanks to Assistant Attorney General Jamie Gorelick (a Clinton appointee) and her wall between the intelligence services and the FBI, the intelligence couldn't be shared. Gorelick would probably be Hillary's attorney general if she were elected. So give me all your reasons and I will use them in a later post.
Now, here is an R rated picture of Hillary. Only click continue reading if you have a strong stomach and an offbeat sense of humor. And no, this is NOT Saturday Boobage.
Pic from Virgil.
Posted by denny at August 10, 2005 11:56 AMIt has nothing to do with gender. Hillary is a Socialist. Perpetuation of our Constitution and freedoms are not in her political vocabulary.
Posted by: Roger .45 on August 10, 2005 12:17 PM1. She's definately a socialist
2. She's anti-Second Amendment
3. She's anti-war
4. She's in bed with the Communist ACLU
5. She's a freakin' Clinton...need I say more?
The evil just rolls off that woman in waves.
Posted by: Bane on August 10, 2005 01:49 PM"Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you. We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
--Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY), June 28th, 2004
See comment below. Also, I believe she is one of most cold and calculating people out there.
And that's saying something.
Elizabeth
Imperial Keeper
Toren's Hillary quote sums it up for me. That and the whole "Hillary Care" fiasco during the 1990s pretty much proves that Hillary is nothing but a Communist. Her recent moderate rhetoric is targeted at "Red State" America. She is trying to win your votes. Don't believe a word she says. Again, refer to Toren's post above mine.
Posted by: Paul on August 10, 2005 02:18 PMShe's a bitch. And any women who sticks with her cheating lying husband for political gain is a self serving whore.That is not someone I would trust to run this country. Thinking solely about yourself is not a trait I find appealing
Posted by: gravdigr on August 10, 2005 02:26 PMShe is a danger to the long term survival of the Republic. That about sums it up.
And no, that's not because she's a left leaning democrat. There are plenty of those who don't threaten the Republic, in part because they sometimes have good intentions, even if their methods are unsound.
Hillary, on the other hand, is and has always been motivated by 1 thing only - her personal ambition to become a historical figure. It's doubtful there are any sacrifices she would not make to that end, including sacrificing your freedoms and mine.
And did I mention she's the Anti-Christ? And back in the early 90s, the Christians all thought it was Bill; well, close, but its her. Wanna see baby blue helmets marching through the streets of this country? Put Hillary in the WH and we're halfway there.
Posted by: daniel on August 10, 2005 02:59 PMI think the thing to do is to make sure she does not win the Senate seat in 2006. My understanding of American Political procedures is not that great since I'm from the Great White North, but I think she has to be a Senator to run for US President. Anyone help me on this?
Otherwise, I agree with the sentiments expressed herein.
Posted by: Martin on August 10, 2005 03:16 PMIt's not just Georgians who are so against Hillary. I live in NH and it'll be a cold day in hell before I vote for that cow.
Posted by: Chablis on August 10, 2005 04:10 PM'Cause she's a lyin, leftist, liberal, loony loser, thass why.
Posted by: babalu on August 10, 2005 04:26 PMShe is a socialist.
She set the womens' movement back 50 years.
We will always know how far Hillary Rodham Clinton went, we will never know how far Hillary Rodham would have gone.
She's still trying to prove something to her father.
Damn, Denny! I can tell that picture has been photoshopped. Her tits aren't nearly that big and her thighs and ankles are about three times that size in real life. Nice try, though.
Posted by: Dash on August 10, 2005 05:17 PMWhoever photoshopped that pic forgot Hillaries pecker.
Posted by: Jeremy on August 10, 2005 05:24 PMAnd, as Dash points out, her cankles.
Posted by: Erik on August 10, 2005 07:14 PMMartin -
Thats incorrect. She does not have to be a sitting Senator to run for US President. Bush 43 wasnt. The legal requirements to be eligible are pretty slim acttually; over 35 and natural born US citizen.
However, politically, if she were defeated for re-election in 2006, she'd likely be considered unelectable as Pres and wouldnt get the Democrat nomination.
Anyone lese remember travelgate, subpoenaed Rose law firm billing records "appearing" in the WH & missing FBI files?
Martin,the only requirement to being elected President is to be born an American citizen, and to be at least 35 years old. There used to be an old joke that we would never have a woman President because no woman would publically admit to being 35.
Posted by: CGeib on August 10, 2005 07:42 PMShe is detestable and a corrupt human being. She has an unquenchable thirst for power. I also agree she is a socialist and she is also a criminal.
Posted by: Kim on August 10, 2005 09:36 PMHIllary is proving herself as untrustworthy by trying to remake herself as a moderate democrat. She is as liberal or more so than Kerry, Kennedy, and Dean.
She is no friend of womens rights, she proved that by hanging onto a cheating hubby who forced several women into sex.
You took my bait Denny. I Knew it would get people talking. Good post by the way.
Posted by: Teresa on August 10, 2005 10:37 PMHilary losing her seat in 06 would be bad, she'd have a free 2 years to make the rounds and get publicity. She'd have an opportunity to distance herself from her voting record and make new statements about things. Politcally, she's brilliant, don't underestimate her.
That said, she'll run whether she wins in 06 or not. We just have to keep her actual nature in mind when she's turning her political tricks. She won't win, but she'll run.
Posted by: Alli on August 10, 2005 10:55 PMAs a Dean Democrat, I'm no big fan of Hillary's, but I want to let you know that this kind of 'discourse' doesn't help your...cause?...
Posted by: Screwy Hoolie on August 11, 2005 09:43 AMIt's so nice to see the ancient southern mentality of misogyny (that's woman hating) and ignorance (that's being uninformed) of politics still thrives. Women you write about on your blog: the ones you hate and the ones you want to f-ck. Yeah.
And you might as well just post 'black folk' pictures with less thinly-veiled terms like "bats," and just go ahead and call 'em whatever it is you really do. When I was growing up it was "coons". Is "bats" an indication that the southern gentleman's mind is evolving? At least be straight-forward with your racism! It's never been a secret, and by the looks of your postings, it still isn't.
Thankfully, most of my southern family didn't carry on such a mind-numbing tradition. How do you sustain that kind of hate each day? Where do you find joy that runs deeper than gawking over Jesscia Simpson photos?
FYI - all politicians play politics, which means they do things they don't tell the public about. Evil things! Every single one of 'em, even Bush.
BUT it's very telling that some southern minds put so much fervor into bashing and belittling Hillary Clinton. That means she's one of the few women who is a real threat. You should be worried and continue to spend your time making stupid useless photos of her. That's all you can do. And weep.
Posted by: Amy King on August 11, 2005 02:46 PMScrewy Hoolie - You actually admit to being a Dean Dimocrat? Don't you realize that Dean is not helping your party's cause?
Posted by: Denny on August 11, 2005 03:49 PMOh, Amy. We can also vote.
Elizabeth
Imperial Keeper
Didn't I just give a Gorelick tirade on here a few weeks ago lol?
Clinton...she is a wolf in ugly old women's clothing. She is a communist at heart and is now trying to work her way center to get votes when her heart is militant left. She is a danger to this nation.
She treated those in the military like they were shit on the bottom of her shoe while Billy was in the Oval Office. Considering my husband is serving in the Army today and has continually served for 21 LONG years, treating our military like shit will, - well, get you on MY shit list.
God save America if she gets into the Whitehouse. The only positive is she might bring back all the stuff they STOLE upon leaving. However, I doubt it. She'd have to have scruples to do that and she and her "can't keep it in his pants" husband lack an ounce.
Let NY keep her. They were stupid enough to vote her ass in...save the rest of us from her treasonous attitude, PLEASE.
Posted by: Shannon on August 11, 2005 04:42 PMAmy:
"That means she's one of the few women who is a real threat."
Absolutely. As I mentioned above, she is a real threat, a danger to the long term survival of the Republic. Glad to find you agree.
Posted by: daniel on August 11, 2005 06:42 PMAmy,
Of course Hillarity is a threat to national security and national sovreignity. If you are the sort of person that would vote for her, you are the sort who hates America and all that we Veterans have fought so hard for.
C'mon, Denny. Her legs aren't near that good.
Posted by: Alan on August 12, 2005 02:13 AMdaniel and Cgeib
Thanks for clearing that up for me. I know understand why everyone else has been discussing the 2008 elections. I assumed that she had to be a Senator to run for President. God help us all if she starts the end run as a Dimocratic nominee.
Maybe Condi can run on the Republican ticket, eh?
Posted by: Martin on August 12, 2005 01:12 PM