November 27, 2005

Got Tweezers?

Ouch!

got tweezers.JPG

got tweezers2.JPG

From Charlieb.

Posted by denny at November 27, 2005 07:30 PM  
Comments

This gives the term 'multiple piercings' a whole new meaning, and somewhere out there is a naked porcupine.

Posted by: Tessa on November 27, 2005 07:38 PM

I've seen and had dogs that have had run ins with porcupines but this must be one dumb dog or one bad ass pork-o-pine.

Posted by: River Rat on November 27, 2005 07:56 PM

Not funny!

Posted by: vicki on November 27, 2005 08:05 PM

Not at all funny! Never mind the camera! Get the poor thing to a vet!!

Posted by: Indigo on November 27, 2005 09:18 PM

Yeah, as a dog owner, I find it hard to look at as well. Poor thing.

Posted by: reiggin on November 27, 2005 09:29 PM

If you think that's bad...you should see the other guy...

Posted by: Radioactive Monk on November 27, 2005 09:37 PM

You know if you ever see one of my animals hurt like this... but the bloody camera down and help.

Posted by: Murray on November 27, 2005 09:49 PM

I believe there was a series of these photos...all of which were taken at the vet's office. Not to worry about the prickly pooch.

Posted by: Tessa on November 27, 2005 10:13 PM

Yep, the dog survived.
But it does demonstrate that pit bulls can be rather single-minded.

Posted by: Toren on November 27, 2005 10:45 PM

Remember the theme of this blog: Pushing the boundaries of bad taste and political incorrectness. Mother Nature is a bitch. That dog learned not to fuck with a porcupine.

Posted by: Denny on November 27, 2005 11:59 PM

Denny, I'll call you on that one, I doubt the dog learned. A friend of mine had a mutt some years ago that went after porcupines regularly.

Posted by: Jeremy on November 28, 2005 12:13 AM

Yeah, bully breeds are typically very single-minded. Especially when they think that they are guarding against something or attacking a danger to their master or others in a pack.

And I don't have a problem with the pictures being posted. It's Denny's blog and he can post whatever he pleases. Is it disturbing to see an animal being subjected to that? Yes. Does that mean it shouldn't be posted publicly? No. Do I particularly like seeing the picture? Nope. But it's not my blog and I can just avert my attention if it starts to bother me too much. :o) That being said, I am glad that Denny posted a couple of other entries in rather quick succession so as to boot these particular pictures further down the page (intentional or not). ;o)

Posted by: reiggin on November 28, 2005 12:56 AM

A gun is needed, one shot on the porcupinne and one for the dog. THis a case in point of why dog are dangerous, they are stupid. If the dog would not quit after the first few quills, what do you think it would do when it is chewing on some kids neck and you're trying to stop it with shouting, a hose or even yourt bare hands.
BTW, how much is the dog worth, the vet bill could buy you a new car no doubt.

Posted by: Jim Macklin on November 28, 2005 06:08 AM

As a vet, I think I should lend my 2 cents worth. 1) As previous poster correctly stated, these pictures were taken at the vet office and it was most likely one of the staff taking pictures to use as an educational tool for pet owners 2) It is not "cruel" to post these pictures. Might remind idiots that allow their dogs to roam loose (because it's natural you know - bullshit) that this is just one of many results that may occur due to that assinine decision and 3) this has nothing to do with the breed of dog. I have seen Huskies, poodles, Golden Retrievers etc. that will consistently go back and attack dogs that just beat the shit out of them, chase cars after having been hit a week before, etc. etc. So this has NOTHING to do with the breed of dog. Ray

Posted by: Ray on November 28, 2005 07:54 AM

Jim Mc... take a Paxil or get help for your anal retention issues.

Posted by: vicki on November 28, 2005 12:05 PM

Thank you, Ray!

Posted by: vicki on November 28, 2005 12:06 PM

Oh God, Painful. This dog looks like he messed around with more than one porcupine. Damn……It makes me cringe just looking at the dog.

Mean while, I'm back from Hawaii to chilly Colorado. Very nice time.

Posted by: scaryguy on November 28, 2005 12:28 PM

Was the dog named "Spike?"

Posted by: BlogDog on November 28, 2005 01:35 PM

Ray, so pit bulls and Golden Retrievers have, in general, the same temperment?
You say you're a vet?
Really....
My humble layperson's impression is that a pit bull is much more likely to get itself into this sort of trouble than most other breeds of dogs, especially those bred for human companionship. But I'm not a vet.

Posted by: Toren on November 28, 2005 05:44 PM

Snopes has the full story--turns out the pit bull is a female named Inca.

Apparently, she healed up just fine... I can't help but wonder how bad her eyes got poked, though. Ouchy!

--TwoDragons

Posted by: Denita TwoDragons on November 28, 2005 06:09 PM

Jim Macklin: You are an idiot.

Posted by: reiggin on November 28, 2005 08:59 PM

How many dogs have you owned? How many animals of any sort have you watched die a slow and painful death? If you spend a small fortune saving a dog, who is going to save your children?

Not an idiot, just a heartless realist. If I see a child drowning in a river at full flood stage, I'll throw a rope, call for help, but I won't commit suicide. If I'm driving down the road and a child on a bike runs out in front of me, I'll stop or turn, but I won't turn into a head on collision with a truck.

That dog was too stupid to quit, it must be owned by a female (judging from the pattern on the collar) and if you are not prepared to defend your family or your pet, you should not have either.

Just my opinion.

Posted by: Jim Macklin on November 28, 2005 09:24 PM

Jim - I had a cat named Doofus who had diabetes. I gave him insulin shots for six months. I finally had to decide if I were keeping him alive for me or for him. One of the hardest things I ever had to do was to put him to sleep. I loved him sumpin' terrible. It's a good thing I'm a snotty rich fuck because I spent over $2500 on him the last six months of his life. It was worth every penny.

Posted by: Denny on November 28, 2005 09:39 PM

The dog is actually a Bull Terrier, not a pit bull...

Our rescued Pit Bull mix does not have a mean bone in his body. He is not dog or people aggressive. Though he does have something against big afro haircuts (we think he was abused by someone with one).

Posted by: Kirk on November 28, 2005 09:45 PM

Been there Denny, I lost two collies a few years back. We have very compassionate vets who told us that we would know when it was time to release their spirits. I guess that's how you have to look at it. I know you don't believe in a here after but I would like to think that there such a place after all this and my pets will there waiting. They were great companions and they will be again. It sounds corny but it’s how I feel.

Cheers

Posted by: scaryguy on November 28, 2005 10:03 PM

Jim, you don't make sense. You say: "if you are not prepared to defend your family or your pet, you should not have either." but then earlier you said that you wouldn't help save the life of a child if it put your life in danger. That's contradictory. At least the way I read it.

And you're obviously not military or public servant material. I'm glad most other human beings aren't quite so selfish. If that were the case, we'd have no voluntary firemen, no EMTs, and no voluntary military. The great human beings are the ones who put their own life at risk to save another life. Especially that of a child.

As for my original statement, it had nothing to do with how you would handle the vet situation but everything to do with the fact that you said: "THis a case in point of why dog [sic] are dangerous, they are stupid." THAT is an idiotic statement. You can't make a blanket statement like that based on some overblown media portrayals. If that were the case, then the 2nd Amendment would have been overturned long ago.

Dogs are intelligent, loyal, and brave. Ask a policeman who's worked with a K9 unit what he thinks about the usefulness of dogs. Or ask someone who's worked with, trained, or used a service dog. Your statement was either idiotic or ignorant.

I've personally known more well-tempered and useful dogs than I've known well-tempered and useful liberals.

Posted by: reiggin on November 28, 2005 11:23 PM

*whew* I'm glad Jim Macklin isn't in the emergency-response business, or there'd be a lot of dead people left in his wake.

I'll remember your words. They give me all the more reason to continue down the path I've chosen to take; they show me what I'm up against: selfish amorality couched in brutal logic, devoid of any sort of genuine compassion.

I've met invertebrate animals with more common decency than you.

--TwoDragons

Posted by: Denita TwoDragons on November 28, 2005 11:53 PM

OWWWWWWW!

Oh man... that just hurts to look at. That poor dog! I've NEVER seen a quill attack like that before. Good heavens...

Posted by: AFSister on November 29, 2005 11:14 AM

That dog was too stupid to quit, it must be owned by a female (judging from the pattern on the collar)

I like animals more than I do most people, Jim reinforces my thinking! Not only does he think dogs are stupid, he obviously thinks women are stupid, too... Men like Jim remind me why I like being single and buy silly dog collars!

I drove across country this summer with two dogs who behaved better than two kids...or one husband!


Posted by: vicki on November 29, 2005 11:16 AM

After reading Jim Macklin's posts, a quote from Hericlitus came to mind that I think fits this situation perfectly:

"The soul is dyed the color of it's thoughts.
Think only on those things that are in line with your principles and can bear the light of day. The content of your character is your choice. Day by day, what you choose, what you think, and what you do is who you become. Your integrity is your destiny...it is the light that guides your way."

I'm not sure what color Macklin's soul is but the word dark comes to mind.


Dogs are not human. They don't think and feel the way we do. They act, react and bond according to instinct and training. Part of the pact we humans established with wild dogs and wolves long ago was to provide them with a structured environment that included training, companionship and food. They provide companionship and security to name a few benefits. It is a worthwhile, nay probably the "most" worthwhile symbiotic relationship in nature. We have got the better of the deal by far.

Short of being a man killer, you don't shoot a dog because he acts like a poorly trained and kept dog. You correct the circumstances that led to the problem.

Posted by: Jesse on November 30, 2005 12:45 PM

Good post Jesse. These pictures made me sick...I don't like seeing animals suffer.

Jim's comments took me over the edge....

Posted by: Vicki on December 1, 2005 12:02 AM
Post a comment