July 25, 2006

International Force

Now they're talking about deploying an international force in Lebanon as part of a cease fire agreement. Yeah. That's gonna do a lot of good. The only time an international force is worth anything is if it is composed mainly of United States troops. Any other international force just gets out of the way and hides from all the fighting.

If there is gonna be an international force, I do not want to see one United States soldier in it. I would like to see it mainly made up of French forces. Then they could teach Hezbollah how to surrender properly.

Posted by denny at July 25, 2006 04:05 PM  Category: French Bashing
Comments

That's one we'll definitely need to stay out of. The US is already seen as pro-Israel and any troops in the area would become just as much a target as Israeli troops.

I'd recommend Russian or other Eastern Bloc types. Perhaps Canadians... someone who all sides would view as neutral.

Posted by: Pat on July 25, 2006 04:59 PM

At least with the French joining the Arabs there won't be a shortage of water. Neither uses much.

Posted by: gene Hall on July 25, 2006 05:07 PM

Much better would be to capitalize on strategic distraction. While Israel is cutting off their hezbollocks, we should go after the Iranian puppet master. Hit their nuke sites, command & control, communications, and anything else of value.

Posted by: Rurik on July 25, 2006 05:08 PM

I see Commie Annan is saying Israel targeted a small UN outpost on purpose and killed four piss-keepers with a rocket.

Get real, Commie; if Israel targeted any UN installation they'd take out a lot more than just four of your useless-prick buddies, hopefully including that motherfucker Jan Egeland.

Posted by: Aussie Bloke on July 25, 2006 08:08 PM

Germany promised to send troops as long as Hezballoo promised not to shoot at them.

Posted by: Ralph Gizzip on July 25, 2006 08:58 PM

"Then they could teach Hezbollah how to surrender properly."

Like in Korea or vietnam? pearl harbor? panama? or the twins towers, or better in iraq?


US history is so short, but 65% of lost war and surrendering, or worst being saved by the french! with so who's surrendering?

Posted by: Jopo on July 25, 2006 09:29 PM

Yeah Jopo. How many wars have we had to bail you out of? And now you're getting ready to surrender to the Moo-slimes. Do you speak German? No? You're welcome.

Posted by: Denny on July 25, 2006 10:02 PM

I think Jopo just wants the AOTW award.

Posted by: tc on July 25, 2006 10:27 PM

Jopo the clueless frog thinks that the US surrendered after Pearl Harbor. Is that what they teach you in Frogland?

Maybe you should STFU and go be useful by making some wine or cheese. If you can't do either, maybe you can find a tourist to be rude to, or a German to surrender to.

Prosper, you wanna bitchslap some sense into your friend here?

Posted by: Squidley on July 26, 2006 01:38 AM

If Israel was going after the UN they'd be using .22's and Kofi would know about it... briefly.

Obnxious thieving little fuck that he his.

Posted by: Murray on July 26, 2006 01:48 AM

Denny, do you remember 1983, Beyrut ? Shortly after the barracks bombing, the order was given for the Marines to begin withdrawal from Lebanon. Is that what you call cut and run ?
French troops didn't do better. At least, in retaliation for the attacks, France launched an air strike in the Beqaa Valley against Iranian Revolutionary Guard positions.

Posted by: Prosper on July 26, 2006 02:44 AM

The commander of UN "peace keeping" is french...http://www.un.org/Depts/dpko/missions/unifil/facts.html

Posted by: doug on July 26, 2006 08:02 AM

Prosper - Yes, I do remember Beirut 1983. I have referred to that many times on this blog. That is the one thing Reagan did that pissed me off. We shouldn't have been there in the first place. We called Israel off the Palestinians and Yasser Arafuck and let them ecape. Ariel Sharon said many times that he should have killed Arafuck there. That was his biggest regret. How were we rewarded for saving Arafuck's ass? We were bombed by Hezbollah. When Reagan pulled out the Marines, he should have carpet bombed the Bekaa Valley. Another commenter said he sent cruise missiles up the Valley as a going away present, but I don't remember that. See I agree with you. That was cut and run.

I think when Clinton pulled us out of Somalia (where we shouldn't have been in the first place), he should have sent the Somali warlords some going away presents.

Because of 1983, I don't want any US troops sent to Lebanon. I also don't want to call Israel off until they destroy Hezbollah in Lebanon. I'd like to see them take out Syria as well. Hezbollah, Syria, and Iran do not know how to play nice. A cease fire plays into their hands.

Posted by: Denny on July 26, 2006 12:11 PM

united states troops? is that what you call your ill-diciplined little larger louts your so-called government send to fight it's stupid wars.

the best troops are british. don't forget it.

Posted by: matthew g on July 26, 2006 12:34 PM

Matthew - Now you sound like an idiot. There is no military in the world that can equal the United States military. The Brits come close, but they are no match. Sad to say, I'd prefer an Aussie to a Brit. I'd put your SAS up against our SEALs anyday. You don't have the technology, training, or the numbers. I like you, but when you make statements like that, you are asking to be bitchslapped on this blog.

Posted by: Denny on July 26, 2006 10:27 PM

"Then they could teach Hezbollah how to surrender properly."

Like in Korea or vietnam? pearl harbor? panama? or the twins towers, or better in iraq?

US history is so short, but 65% of lost war and surrendering, or worst being saved by the french! with so who's surrendering?

Hey Denny, I found jopo!?!?!?!?! What an asshole and Now he's my new fucking project.

"US history is so short, but 65% of lost war and surrendering, or worst being saved by the french! with so who's surrendering?"

What French history or French math book did you get that out of. As for Viet Nam, we wouldn't have even been there if it wasn't for your sorry country and it's defeat. French Indochina (now Viet Nam, you ignorant slut) was a colony that you lost to the Japanese during WWII then after the US, England, Canada, Poland and a Few French with balls liberated your country, you went right back into the colony business again.

Ho Chi Mien came to the US for help getting you out first and we didn't listen because we thought you were an ally (Big Mistake). Then he went to the commies and they saw an opportunity, not for Viet Nam but for themselves to spread their shit communism at the cost Vietnamese live. We took the bate and the rest is a sad history of our proud soldier's winning all the battles but our government loosing the war. I have the highest respect for our Viet Nam vets to the very end. Our government failed them not the other way around. And that is the God Damn truth.

OK jopo.....Slap Slap Slappity Slap.

Cheers Bitch.

BTW, It was getting a little slow out here, now its picking up. Denny, see what happens when you get pissed off. It gets to be fun. Bring on the French trolls, Yeeehaaaaah

Panama, WTF french idiot. Pearl Harbor....6 months after Pearl Harbor the Japaneese were loosing the war, Midway battle. Just like Yamato the Japanese Pearl harbor attack planner predicted, Japan has 6months to win or its over. jodo read "Lightening Strike" or Look it up pinhead.

Posted by: scaryguy on July 27, 2006 12:21 AM

Matthew, you don't know anything at all about the US armed forces, do you? Or are you just hoping that Denny will allow you to run for AOTW after all? Keep making moronic statements like that, and he just might.

Posted by: Squidley on July 27, 2006 12:58 AM

Gentlemen, may i propose a pee-contest? Whoever is the longest wins...

Seriously, we must all agree that there is no military in the world that can equal the United States military. Matthew was just teasing...

But that does not mean that the US solider is the most efficient one. Only battles with similar numbers and technology on both sides could give us informations. And fortunately, it's not close to happen.

Posted by: Prosper on July 27, 2006 04:17 AM

denny - of course I'm askking for a bitchslapping; it's half the fun of the blogverse! blogs are for airing one's ideas, and getting complete strangers to reply; thus its the ideal place for arguing.

Of course, as prosper points out, there is no fighting force on earth that can equal the united states in terms of man power. having said that, I am proud of the british SAS, and believe them to be the most elete fighting force on earth, but then I'm biassed having been brought upp on stories of their heroics. as for the ausssies: bah! ask tthem who won the ashes!

Posted by: matthew g on July 27, 2006 04:57 AM

Why is it that the French cannot spell the word Beirut? Why is it that they just won't shut the fuck up and go take a bath?

Posted by: lisakay on July 27, 2006 08:11 AM

Wikipedia : Beirut (Arabic: بيروت‎ ​ translit: Bayrūt) is the capital, largest city, and chief seaport of Lebanon. It is sometimes known by its French name, Beyrouth.

You're welcome lisa

Posted by: Prosper on July 27, 2006 08:16 AM

Wikipedia : Beirut (Arabic: translit: Bayrūt) is the capital, largest city, and chief seaport of Lebanon. It is sometimes known by its French name, Beyrouth.

Actually, Beirut was once considered the Paris of the Middle east. Go Figure. Anyways, yes prosper, you are right. choke, choke. The US and Reagan never should have pulled the Marines out of Beirut after that attack but Denny is also right that we should have let the IDF beat the crap out of those little shiet heads over there in the 1980's.

Notice that "Bushitler" is letting the joooooooooossssss do the righteous job. Of course the LSM doesn't mention that. The time line that BUSH gave them is BS. Take your time, IDF and make it last. Simple question, who started the fight, and now who's finishing it.

Here's what I would do, if I was Condi and Bush, I'd approach Syria and make a sweet offer i.e. trade and lift santions, $$$$, to dump Iran and the Hezbollah, maybe knock off a few of their Hez big guys. Help the Lebanese evac or security, and save some face, help kick the Hez out, begin normalizing relations with Israel and the US and reap huge trade with us and the rest of the world. It's a shitty deal for Syria if stick with IRAN. Then we politically slap IRAN's government, embarrass the hell out of them, and get tough on IRAN nukes. Make it an Iran government thing and not the Iranian people. Maybe the Iranian students overthrow their muhhlall. A free and democratic Iran is one of my hopes.


BTW, I would win the pissing contest. Just because...

Cheers

Posted by: scaryguy on July 27, 2006 09:03 PM

Anyways, yes prosper, you are right

i'm so happy, may i print this ?

Posted by: Prosper on July 28, 2006 04:01 AM

Prosper - Sure. Sometimes I actually agree with you, or maybe you agree with me?

Posted by: Denny on July 28, 2006 12:04 PM

Anyways, yes prosper, you are right

i'm so happy, may i print this ?

OK Prosper, don't spend it all in one place.

BTW, The pee contest? We men say pissing contest. We are manly men with manly hair on our manly chests. Oh-Oh-Oh-Oh-Oh-Oh-Oh-Oh-Oh-Oh (A Tool Time salute to Tim Allen) The ladies on this blog may believe otherwise. To them we are more like boys throwing sand at each other in the cyber sandbox. ;-) in many respects, they're probably right. Anyway, it's pissing contest and I'd still win. Just because.

Cheers

Posted by: scaryguy on July 29, 2006 12:22 AM
Post a comment