I dont think thats ours. I think its the French rear guard we are seeing.

ECHO5BRAVO........

Can`t be the French rear guard, they still have a weapon & no white flags are being waved.

Yeah besides, if they were French, the bike would be pink and have little tassel's coming off the bars and rifle.

Hey Prosper,
Is this more European technology???

Denny:

I wish you would post a thread on the U.S. military build-up in the Gulf Coast. I'm not talking about the focus on Iraq, I'm talking about Iran.

The situation in Iraq doesn't bother me. As-is they can't destroy or deal a major blow to the U.S. But Iran? If the Dimocrats retain control of Congress, and we elect a Dimocratic President who does nothing but sit on her (or his) hands concerning the nulcear capabilities of Iran, then we're fucked. And I mean FUCKED. Those bastards would love nothing more than to see a nuclear weapon of any type or size used against our country. They would LOVE to see it carried out.

Me? I want to see a joint operation between Israel and the United States that would decimate Iran. I think we should bomb them into the Stone Age, leaving ZERO chance that they will ever develop nuclear technology ever again. Cave men aren't very good at enriching uranium, are they?

Call me crazy but if these filithy cocksuckers develop nuclear weapons, the U.S. will be their primary target, and one way or the other they'll carry out an attack against us. Mark my words.

I CALL BULLSHIT.
When the dems get done, it will be illegal for the troops to have weapons. Substitute a Daisy B B gun and you would be closer to the mark.

Marksman, No worries friend. Our next President is going to be Fred Thomspon (fingers crossed, a look up to the Gods and a sign of the cross) and like Reagan, no one will F'with us. Also, bombing Iran back into the stone age would be bringing them forward in time. Sorry I couldn't resist. I predict a major storm is brewing in that area for our next conquest Iran. And I also will state as I have before, this was part of Bush's plan from the get go to decimate all of what we now know as the middle east, or the central supplier of terrorism. 20 years from now, we'll all look back and go Thank God Bush had the balls to tell Democrats and liberal to F'off as we sip drinks and soak in sun as we vacation in some far off Middle Eastern country with beautiful beaches being waited on by some poor camel jockey that at one time would have wanted to behead us, but now just wants to wait on us hand and foot (as it should be).

But is it a John Deere wagon and a Schwinn buke?

I, too, hope that we will remove the Iranian threat. It could be done without any boots on the ground, because their economy is so dependent on cheap gas--the supply of which we could cut off with some strategic bombing and the occupation of Iranian rigs in the Persian Gulf.

However, W's ill-advised and ineptly-executed "war" in Iraq has undone all the progress that was made after the Vietnam debacle. Now that we need to act, in a much more timely and urgent fashion than was ever necessary in Iraq, the mess that W made in Iraq makes it all the more difficult to do so.

Oh, and W's line about "we need to fight the terrorists over there so that we don't have to fight them at home"? What a load of baloney! The way to keep the terrorists from harming us at home is to keep Moslems out of the US. Yet W, in his bungling foolishness, has give then green light to our accepting some 7,000 Iraqi "refugees." How much you wanna bet they won't be the last? How much you wanna bet that they will be among the next terrorists operating in the US?