HawHaw......HaH......

We sent this picture to the Immigration servive, they will be around to see you very soon!

Too bad this ain`t true, Too bad Immigration service don`t give a rats ass.

Who snapped a picture of my neighbors?

The fat puto must be Ron Jeremy's cousin, Jose.

Chunky there looks like he's eating pretty well ...

Peggy U,
I bet you that Chunky only buys Brand Name Groceries, with his food stamps (a.k.a. "Gringo Taxpayer's Money")

They must have been to the Mardi Gras. And the one right of center is "showing his tits".

Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented immigrant" is like calling a drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist."

Bring on another "Day Without a Mexican." I can't wait for the fast lane to open up without stinky gas and people peddeling a truck-full of matresses down the road.

How about a Year Without an ILLEGAL!?

How about a Decade Without an ILEGAL!?

Eh, I'll be happy with a "Day" Without AN ILLEGAL!...

eros total-
I'm an Undocumented 'Agent.'

Eros Total

Hey, this is 2007 & it is more important to be politically correct then to have control over who is in this country legally or illegally. Don`t think so? Well, ask your dimocrat House or Senate perp & see what that gets you.

I hope you understand my comment was tongue in cheek.........Personally I would like to be driving the Bus taking illegals back to the border & then tossing them over the fence.Until our Senate & Congress critters as well as GWB get some balls it aint gonna happen.

Looks like the fat one got his beads for showing his rack.

Dudley1,

We need to do like Ike did and not just throw them back over the border, but ship them deep into Mexico. Ike threw some wetbacks* onto old ships which tossed and heaved down to well below Baja California. I hear the passengers were not pleased with their accommodations, and that no one in the US gave a rat's ass.

*Eisenhower's plan was called "Operation Wetback." Oh, for the days when whites could be whites without guilt!

Eros total,

Great quote! I'm gonna spread it around.

CD,

When I saw these four worthless f@cks, I thought, "target practice"! How about you?

Squidley-
When I saw these four worthless fucks, I instantly thought of the welfare line in National City. I thought of the lineup at SD County Jail. I thought of the dirtbags at the local Home Depot. I thought of 85% of my highschool class. I thought of mass deportation. I thought of liberals taxing me more to support these assholes. I thought of how scary it is that no one is doing anything about the influx of scumbags in this country.

But to answer your question...

...yes.

Those of us who know your writing know that the previous post wasn't yours. haha must be getting tired of masturbating to gay porn and needed some attention again. Go figure.

Since I live deep in the heart of Chambodia (where English is a foreign language,) I have noticed a few things. A lot of the Mexicans around here actually file their taxes. Now, in reality they are hedging their bets in case amnesty comes around. But a lot of them actually don't mind doing it. Like many of the scum immigrants before them, they actually appreciate the opportunity to make serious green and they figure the taxes are the price of admission. And not a few of them have actually volunteered for Military Service.

What do you say to those guys?

I say do it legally, and I won't have a problem with it! Simple.

Another Government Employee - Exactly what part of illegal alien do you not understand? If they want to join the military in return for citizenship, go for it. Otherwise, they are breaking the fucking law!

AGE-
It's not about "Mexicans", it's about ILLEGAL Mexicans. How many wetbacks do you know that actually make it to H&R Block on their way home from Window "E"?

GMAFB!

Not Squidley,

No, really, it was me. I just had a visceral, unintellectual reaction to those worthless sacks of protoplasm, and so my comment was, in keeping with the part of my brain that reacted, non-cerebral.

And I do love the Eros Total line about illegal aliens.

Squidley-
My answer to your question remains the same...

CD and Denny,

Even if they're here legally, I have a problem with Mexicans and other "Hispanics," as well as Laotians, Somalis, Ethiopians, Chinese, and, let's not forget, Koreans. Why? They aren't white.

Whites are only 15% of the world's population. Is it so much to ask that we have a country where we are the majority, where our interests come first, where our culture is dominant? After all, we don't mind when Congolese do their thing in Congo. It's OK when the Thais are Thai in Thailand. Nobody has a problem with Nepalis being the majority in Nepal. Everyone's OK with Morocco being the home of Moroccan culture. What's wrong with America--and Europe, our ancestral homeland--being white?

The flip side of this is that the various immigrants aren't assimilating. They don't seem to want to. The South Americans have their Spanish-language TV, and they have Spanish speakers in stores to speak Spanish with (coming soon to a business near you!). The Chinese bring their customs with them, and continue to practice them--and they send their kids to Chinese school on the weekends, too. The Hmong send their witch doctors into our hospitals. The Moslems have their calls to "prayer" and intolerance of all that is not Islamic. The Koreans are about as insular as you can get. No one is becoming American.

It's fine with me if they don't want to be American. It's all the more reason for them not to be here. But if they're not going to even try to be Americans, then they should stay home--where they belong.

I do believe that we can accomodate small percentages of minorities. However, there should never be a large enough number of them that they can challenge the legitimacy of the majority.

So no, it's not just about illegal Mexicans. It's about all Mexicans. They are corrupt, Third World, uneducated peons, and the proper place for them to be like that is Mexico, their country.

Squidley-
I raise my glass to your passion, but until Americans step up and do something, it's close to futile.

No, the third world Pedro's de Los Estados Unitos are never going to step up and do something about their shitty situation in their shitty fucking country. No, they are never going to do something to try and better their lives (besides raping us of ours.) Yes, they will continue to shit on our flag, and our Country. Yes, they will continue to sap you of your tax dollars to pay for a few extra kids and a crack habit. Yes, they will continue to vote dimocrat.

Here I am all pissed off again...

Squidley.....

All the people or Nationalities you mention do not belong here because they are not white? It seems to me the first people here were also lax because they did not apply race discrimatory immigration policies to prohibit Non-Indian immigration to the heartland of the various Indian Tribes & confederations.

They could have at least imposed a waiting period until the next ice age & allowed those that walked across the Bering sea land bridge as did the ancestors of the Indians.

I think you should recognize our white ancestors did not assimilate very well to the pre-existing Indian cultures in place here, it appears to me that they changed what was in place to that which was familiar to them & alien to the resident Indians.In fact the Indians were brushed aside , their history,culture & customs destroyed all for the benefit of the now dominant white majority who is facing a similar & inevitable decline.Will the future latino majority be as ruthless or more accomodating....Behold the future , we know not what it will provide for us & our descendants.

As for the less then jolly foursome....this is the former band which backed up Richie Valens, they have fallen on hard times as royalties have dried up.

Squidley - All the Chinese people I know have assimilated and have become good Americans. Likewise, the Japanese. I don't know any Filipinos personally, but there is Michele Malkin. We have nothing to worry about regarding non-Moo-slime Asians.

dudley1,

Yes, the stone-age savages (some of whom practiced human sacrifice and cannibalism) now called American Indians were indeed "brushed aside" by the technologically and intellectually superior white colonists.* So what? How is this any different from what has happened around the world throughout human history? Our ancestors took the land and killed many of the people on it, and I feel no guilt whatsoever for that. (Read up on the French and Indian Wars and you'll learn more about the Indians' brutality.)

Our great ancestors, especially the Founding Fathers--and even if our families are recent arrivals, they are still our ancestors as Americans--created an extraordinary country for themselves and their posterity, i.e., their descendants, which means us.

Personally, I don't want to be colonized by a bunch of 90-IQ Mestizo barbarians who have no connection to our history or our culture, and have limited capacity to participate in our society. I don't want an expansion of our already-extant two-tiered society of the intellectual haves and have-nots. We have enough native-born who are intellectually, culturally, and spiritually "challenged" without needing to add to that group.

*By definition, colonists are not interested in assimilating; rather, they are interested in perpetuating their culture in a new land.

Denny,

I've always said that small numbers of non-white immigrants are OK, but we have to remember that even East Asians, who I am particularly favorably-inclined towards--do not share our heritage. More importantly, examination of our accomplishments versus theirs shows that even though their IQs are, on average, higher than ours, their overall abilities and temperments are different. I don't know why, but the vast majority of human greatness was achieved by whites. There's a reason why the Industrial Revolution happened in Europe and not Asia, and, contrary to the Jared Diamonds of the world, it had less to do with "Guns, Germs, and Steel" than it did with the people who brought it about.

Yes, while many East Asians have assimilated culturally (though I know many, many who have not), they can never assimilate racially. Why is that important? Because America achieved its greatness through the white majority exerting its cultural and moral will upon the nation as a whole. Our collective abdication of that role has left a vacuum which first the blacks, and later other "oppressed" groups, have (naturally) tried to fill. I don't fault them for that. But look what the white abdication of this position has wrought!

Incidentally, the presence of minority immigrants has always brought about feelings of inferiority, envy, and resentment in those immigrants, regardless of the country. I wonder how many Americans have died at the hands of non-white immigrants, from the black immigrant servant who axe-murdered Frank Lloyd Wright's mistress and six others (and set fire to Wright's Taliesin to boot) in 1914 to the resentful, envious South Korean who shot up Virginia Tech this week? We have enough murderers amongst our own; do we really need to add to that group by immigration?

Yeah, yeah, I know most immigrants aren't murderers. GMAFB. But who benefits from immigration: us--or them? If it's not us, why are they here?

dudley1,

The ideal of non-discrimination is a liberal ideal. In a well-ordered society, discrimination is the order of the day. Companies discriminate against the less-qualified in favor of those who can do the job. Schools discriminate against the less-qualified, too. Societies discriminate against criminals. Nations discriminate against potential immigrants who are unassimilable, (in our case) anti-American, or (as in the case of Moslems) both.

You, I, and everyone else who has ever gotten married discriminated against all other women (or men) as potential spouses. We discriminate when we choose friends. We discriminate when we go shopping, both in the stores we patronize and in the products we by.

Discrimination is good, especially when it leads to a strong, well-ordered society. Anti-discrimination is one of the liberal tenets that has gotten us where we are. In fact, the logical end of non-discrimination is preferring to die to discriminating: "...it is more important not to discriminate against people based on their race than to keep the occasional terrorist from getting on a plane." Do you really mean to tell me you're in favor of that?

Hola'. My name is Hose B and I can't wait to rape you gringos of your welfare tax dollars! Note my right thumb giving you the finger? My shiny shoes are just a blatent givaway of my scumbagness. My name is Pedro, and I can't wait to shit on your Country!

I can't wait to have another Anchor Baby here.

Afterall, you stupid Americans owe me, and will continue to pay for me and my 20 kids while I sap off your brilliant system.

Viva los idioticos Americanos!

Check out my shiny shoes!

Gracias'

Squidley......

Thanks for clearing up the mis-conception of Illegal immigrants.....They are really colonists!

The stone age savages called American Indians?? Perhaps their ancestors were but they did have complex confederations & alliances, ever hear of Cohokia or the Iroquois Confederation?

While we are casting stones at the ancestoral past of the American Indian , please remember that all of mankind swung down out of trees in Africa, was black, did practice cannibalism, brutally expanded their presence to other continents,established slavery & developed the concept of racism, thus our ancestors were not something you would invite to dinner any time soon & are not really superior just because our immediate Ancestors were white.

The migration of all of mankind has been stimulated primarily by the quest for food, living space & to expand the civilization or society as that particular group knows it to be.This is not something unique to the Latinos or any of the cultures the superior whites deem it to be. Our racial extraction `s history is one of rape, war, pillaging, brutality & expansion thru destruction & conquering of the neighboring tribes or countries. We are hardy the product of nobility just because our Ancestors wrote the history which has been handed down.

I`ll not make excuses for that which they did, lose much sleep over it or really feel a great deal of guilt but I do recognize from where we came, how we have achieved what we have & the likelihood that others are just as capable of doing to us as our Ancestors did to others. The cloak of nobility or divinity as gods chosen is no real defense of what could well come to be.

Squidley......

Thanks for clearing up the mis-conception of Illegal immigrants.....They are really colonists!

The stone age savages called American Indians?? Perhaps their ancestors were but they did have complex confederations & alliances, ever hear of Cohokia or the Iroquois Confederation?

While we are casting stones at the ancestoral past of the American Indian , please remember that all of mankind swung down out of trees in Africa, was black, did practice cannibalism, brutally expanded their presence to other continents,established slavery & developed the concept of racism, thus our ancestors were not something you would invite to dinner any time soon & are not really superior just because our immediate Ancestors were white.

The migration of all of mankind has been stimulated primarily by the quest for food, living space & to expand the civilization or society as that particular group knows it to be.This is not something unique to the Latinos or any of the cultures the superior whites deem it to be. Our racial extraction `s history is one of rape, war, pillaging, brutality & expansion thru destruction & conquering of the neighboring tribes or countries. We are hardy the product of nobility just because our Ancestors wrote the history which has been handed down.

I`ll not make excuses for that which they did, lose much sleep over it or really feel a great deal of guilt but I do recognize from where we came, how we have achieved what we have & the likelihood that others are just as capable of doing to us as our Ancestors did to others. The cloak of nobility or divinity as gods chosen is no real defense of what could well come to be.

Squidley - East Asians can assimilate racially as many of them are marrying Caucasians. All the young Chinese girls that the 40 year old single women are adopting will most probably also have Caucasian husbands. One of my friends, who is Chinese, has three daughters and they are totally American, as is he. He is a conservative Republican. Another one of my friends has a Vietnamese/Chinese mother. She is all-American. Her one tie to her mother's background is her ability to cook Chinese food. She married a Caucasian (as did her sister) and they all have all-American children. No Chinese or Vietnamese culture. I have friends who have Amerindian in their ancestry and I don't consider them non-white. Methinks you are a bit hung up on racial purity. That is where we part company.

Denny,

I'm less hung up on racial purity than you think. I don't have a problem with limited white-Asian miscegenation. Further, I think that if we're going to let any non-whites in, they ought to be East Asians. However, we really need to keep a lid on the numbers of all immigrants. Immigration--legal or otherwise--is putting a huge strain on the unity and identity of the nation. We need to narrow the gates--maybe even close them completely--for a while and let those who are here assimilate, and, at the same time, we need to get rid of the illegals.

But that's beside the point.

When you think of great composers, who comes to mind? OK, so all the classical composers are white. How about modern composers, in any genre? Great muscians? The only non-whites I come up with are Tan Dun, Seiji Ozawa, and Yo-Yo Ma. Contrast that list with Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Chopin, Satie, Gershwin, Debussy, Mahler, Hyden--there are too many to Liszt (ba-dum-bum!).

How about science--who are the great scientists? Where did the great scientific ideas and innovations come from? Copernicus, Pythagoras, Gallileo, Newton, Aristarchus of Samos, Pauling, Huygens, Thales, Kepler, Archimedes, Hawking, Sagan, Pauli, Oppenheimer, Hippocrates, Rutherford, Da Vinci, Millican, Curie, Einstein, Leibniz.... Now, I know that the Chinese independently invented calculus, but where did they go with that? The Chinese invented gunpowder, but what did they do with it? Who's the most famous Chinese scientist? I'd say Wen Ho Lee--but why is he famous?

Repeat this with any area of human achievement--better yet, read Human Accomplishment--and the results will be much the same (though great works art and architecture are found all over the world, yet even so, many are Western).

I think that whites should, as a whole, remain white, so that we can continue to produce people who make the most prodigious and extraordinary human achievements.

Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe Westerners can continue to achieve greatness in the sciences and the humanities even if we all become CaucAsians. But what if I'm right? What if these people were only able to achieve greatness because they were white? Finally, what culture has ever survived the extinction of its people?

It's not about racial purity, Denny. It's about the survival of the white race.

Denny,

I also have to take you to task for promoting the idea that military service is a good way for foreigners to get citizenship. After all, what happened to the Romans and their armies of mercenaries?

dudley1,

I normally agree with you, and appreciate what you have to say, but I found your last post confusing. (This one isn't too focused either--sorry.)

Yes, we're all descended from the earliest humans who evolved in Africa. So what? We've come a long way, and each group has developed differently.

Writing in the early 19th century, de Toqueville observed that a woman was safe walking alone nearly anywhere in America (I don't think he was including the territories). This certainly isn't true in most of the world, and is far less true now than it was when he wrote it. Why is that? It couldn't possibly have anything to do with the greater presence of non-whites in America, could it?

Frankly, I'd rather have an early American over for dinner than a modern African, not least because I wouldn't have to wonder if the early American were going to chop off my hands, or maybe just kill me. Race matters.

What's my point? Whites, and whites alone, have uniquely developed an extraordinary ability: the ability to care about, and be compassionate towards, strangers. We regularly give money and time to total strangers. Other groups have far more limited capacities or desires to do this. I don't know why, but it just is. Sadly, it's one of the reasons the liberals are destroying us: they believe that we achieved our greatness at the expense of others, so now must give everything to them.

Lest you get the wrong idea, I still believe that we are all God's children, equally deserving of His blessings. Having said that, I don't believe that we are all equally capable of attaining His blessings, regardless of race (and no, I do not believe that I have reached anything approaching a state of grace).

Squidley......

You are less hung up on racial purity then we might think?.....Maybe if you did not bring it up in every post we might not be so confused. My post is confusing? I beg to differ as to who is confusing in what is posted, let me give an example.

You stated that the white`s & whites alone have uniquely developed an extraordinary capacity to show compassion to strangers. Well if the 40 to 60 million people who died in the European theater of WW2 could offer their assessment as to the compassion of Hitler,Stalin,Mussolini & the legions under their control a different position might occur to you. Really Squidley, this occured in our lifetimes & should still be in the forefront of our conscious thoughts.

One thing the German experience should have made clear is that if you tell a lie long enough & often enough , people will believe. The horror which descended on Europe was initiated, developed, brought to power & applied to all of Europe by Hitler who preached a doctrine of pure Aryan Superiority..... "Blond, Nordic & White" About the only one who would agree with your position on this is Aramalamadingdong from Iran.

I stated in a post some time back that while I agree with much of your postings, you are at heart a racist even if you do not seem to be aware of that fact. I do agree that a segment of the white race is farther along the evolutionary path to true brotherhood, but you are still are not of a mind to accept capacity for those of other racial extraction to have native intellect, capacity for education, to function intelligently in society or to contribute to human evolution.

You stated we are all Gods children equally deserving of his blessings.... but apparently feel we to be his favorites as others are not capable of achieving his blessings regardless of race. I `m sorry but that condescending view still smacks of racism to me.

We are at a critical junction here in the United States in that a wave of imigration is sweeping into us uncontrolled, uninvited & in present form unwanted. I do not believe we will ever be able to stop it from happening as the Latinos are simply outgrowing us in population & the move to our country is inevitable. We do have the capacity & opportunity to gain control of our borders to insure the immigration will be in accordance to our laws & culture. This is the real issue here , stopping it is not really possible , controlling it is.

As usual, our discussions range all over. I'll try to be brief.

I bring up race--not in every post, but often--because it is relevant and important. Modern liberalism, the reigning ideology of the day, would have us think that only individuals matter. The facts indicate otherwise.

The horrors of WWII do not alter the extraordinary achievements of Western civilization. That does not change the fact that it was during the 20th century that humans became better at killing huge numbers of other humans. Even so, the Germans were not the masters at this "art": they killed an estimated 21 million. The USSR outdid them, with their total estimated to be 62 million. However, the real masters of mass killing are the Communist Chinese, with an estimated 77 million killed under Mao and those who followed him. Of course, we have the Japanese (6 million), the Cambodians (2 million), the Vietnamese (1.7 million), the Koreans (1.7 million), the Pakistanis (1.5 million), and many other non-whites who have joined the ranks. Clearly, killing people on a masive scale is not limited to Caucasians. (Data from here.)

I disagree with your assessment of my opinion of other races. While I recognize that there may be extraordinary individuals of any race, I also acknowledge that statistics based on huge data sets are far more instructive for revealing overall trends, and despite popular opinion, they reveal that the races are not equivalent in behavior or achievement. Besides, if I were a real racist, would I consistenly point out that, on average, East Asians have higher IQs (105) than whites (100), and Ashkenzai Jews (115) the highest of all? Would I point to the huge number of extremely successful Jews in medicine, the law, and the sciences? Check out who wins Nobel prizes. Jews are hugely over-represented, considering what a tiny fraction of humanity they are. In the same vein, blacks are hugely over-represented among criminals, especially for violent crimes like rape and murder. Liberal dogma can't explain why both these discriminated-against groups have such radically different outcomes; IQ, and the notion that genetics has far more to do with behavior than we usually believe, can.

As for your last point, I couldn't disagree with you more. America will only become a Latin American country if we let it. Our destiny is in our hands. We can stop the massive influx of Mestizos, we can remove the illegals. Eisenhower's Operation Wetback was a huge success, and the only thing that keeps us from replicating his success is that we lack the will.

Anyway, sorry to have taken so long to get back to you; I've had a very full plate this week.

Squidley - You fucked up in the first paragraph.

Modern liberalism, the reigning ideology of the day, would have us think that only individuals matter.

Actually, modern liberalism is against the individual. Modern liberalism believes that only groups matter and they should be monolithic. All blacks should think alike (i.e. think like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton) is a good example of that. Or everyone who is not a liberal is a Nazi or fascist, ignoring the fact that Nazi's and fascists were socialists. But then we never said that liberals were intelligent.

I'd disagree, Denny.

When I say that liberalism holds the individual and his wants as the greatest good, it means that liberalism is against the needs of the society that the individuals are a part of. If any part of the society gets in the way of individuals asserting their desires--like not allowing homosexuals to have same-sex marriages--then society must be changed to allow individuals to realize their desires, regardless of the cost to society. Liberalism rejects God and elevates man to what was God's place. Liberalism rejects the transcendant, i.e., that which goes beyond ourselves, like family, society, the nation, God. That's what I mean when I say that liberalism puts the individual first.

Add to this the Sacred Other--the designated minorities that are the fetish object of liberals--and we get the rest of the picture that you brought up. The Others that the liberals worship are those who are least like themselves: non-white, non-Christian, non-Western, not heterosexual. The more of these traits the better, which is why liberals love Moslems so much--they're the antithesis of white Christian monogamous Westerners! Note that even if liberals are not Christian (etc.) themselves, the fact that Western society is based on Christianity means that non-Christians--or, better yet, anti-Christians--are to be welcomed. However, we have to remember that liberals don't actually want to rub shoulders with their beloved Others; they only wish to fawn upon them from afar, where they can stay pristine in the liberals' idealization of these people who are more "real" and "authentic" than Westerners.

So we're both describing two aspects of the same sick phenomenon: liberalism.