Well Said.

Good-Golly Jeebus!

A 'scorch' across party-lines ... and AOTW at that???

YES!!!

Mine Eyes Have Seen the GLORY!

Amen to McCain being one of the biggest disapointments ever. I used to like him before he did a backflip off the deep end.

Well deserved!

Treasonous pigs.

"Jorge Bush". I like that. I think I will call him that from now on. Whore-hey Boooosh.

Hey Denny, lighten up. Isackson and Chambliss were with us on this one.
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/06/07/ap3801158.html

You left out Señor Martinez. Should I even bother writing him to explain why he'll never get another vote from me?

Teresa - Remember your senator, Chuck Hagel, is for the amnesty bill as well.

Perpetual Student -
I've already made my yard sign for the Florida primary in 2010: ABM - ANYBODY BUT MARTINEZ. And I'm on a nice busy street corner.

Send those ABM posters arround the country for the Republican primaries. Anybody But McInsane.

River Rat, Denny, DanS, CharlieDelta,and me, Rurik, all in agreement on this!
When Jorge said "I'm a unifier not a divider", I guess he was telling us the truth for once.

I agree too!

Tell me: is there any action other than deportation or incarceration that isn't amnesty? I don't think so. So, whatever they call it, it's an amnesty bill.

Squidley -
Deportation sounds alright to me.

Instead of deportation, lets send them to Iraq to help with the peace keeping and bring home our troops in the process. I would advocate for a 1-1 ratio, but thats not practical, so how about a 5-1 ratio?
At a distance its hard to tell the Mexicans from Iraqis.

Jeremy,

Are you suggesting that five Mestizos could possibly do the job of one American fighting man? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Give 50 Mestizos machine guns, hand grenades, Claymores, and the like, and one Marine, armed with a butter knife and a BB gun, could take them all out.

Incidentally, in an incredible development, Tom Tancredo came out for stopping all legal immigration during the recent debate, and didn't back down when attacked. Now the idea is gaining ground in the Right circles. Already Joseph Farrah and, to a more limited degree, Robert Spencer are getting on board. Who's next? Join the bandwagon now!

Count me among the folks who are adopting "Jorge" as Bush's permanent moniker

Yeah Denny, I am well aware of Chucky's take on the illegal's. Same as Dubya's. "If you suck up to them enough they will vote for you." And that is why I am a minority in my small city here in the Heartland.

No Squidly, I'm not suggesting that at all. I just think its a descent ratio to start with, and we could use the same planes that way. I seriously doubt you could squeeze twenty mexicans into each seat, but I see cars all the time with about twenty squeezed into a four passenger sedan.

Just for you squidley, what do you call all twenty members of one Mexican family riding in a Lincoln?
Car thieves.
How did they get all twenty members of one Mexican family into that Lincoln?
They picked the lock.
why did Santa Anna only use 1800 men in his assault on the Alamo? He only had 12 wagons.

Jeremy .....

What do you get when you cross a Mexican with an octopus?..... not sure , but you ought to see it pick lettuce!

I keep wondering, If we get the border secure, what will the guys at The other San Diago Zoo do for initiation?
Sorry there Squidley, you got me wondering when you brought them up. And FYI, I never said a darn thing about giving them weapons, ammo, armor, or even MRE's. I just said send them to Iraq.

Jeremy, I thought that your Spic jokes were very cruel and totally out of line even though they were all true. Bahaha. Ditto deporting their ass's to Iraq. If they want to come here illegally then they had better be willing to fight for our country.

Did anyone catch Dennis Miller's rant about Harry Reid on Ham's America on Sunday? It was FANTASTIC.
I'm looking for it on u-tube. On Monday, ole Harry reffered to illegal immigrants as undocumented Americans. 'scuse me?

Michelle Malkin has it at hotair.com

While the idea of sending Mexicans to Iraq has its merits--namely, it gets them out of the US--I cannot agree with using that as a condition for their getting citizenship. Mexicans already have a country: Mexico. That's where they belong.

There are two huge problems with using Mexicans as soldiers. The first one is the danger of using mercenaries. The Romans used Germanic mercenaries--and then the mercenaries turned around and destroyed the Empire. Mercenaries simply don't have the loyalty to the nation they're fighting for that citizens do.

The other problem is that America should be a white-majority nation, and while we can tolerate minorities in small numbers, we should not be doing anything that aids the Latin Americanization of the US. Is there any Latin American country that isn't a messed-up hellhole? Do we want that to be the future of our country? Granting citizenship to Mexicans just worsens that problem.

In case anyone thinks there's a something wrong with a white-majority nation, consider this: do you have a problem with China being a Chinese-majority nation? Do you have a problem with Zimbabwe being a black-majority nation? Do you have a problem with Peru being a Peruvian-majority nation? I'm guessing you don't. If it's OK for them to have their countries, it should be OK for us to have ours.

Squidley-
The only problem with your last paragraph is that you forgot one thing...

...only white people can be "racist" in this country, remember?

"Mexicans already have a country: Mexico. "
didn't every immigrant have a native country, before invading north america?

and you're opposing white with chinese or peruvian. Did you know the People's Republic of China (PRC) officially recognizes 55 ethnic minority groups within China in addition to the Han majority ? And that they promote ethnic minority groups' economic and cultural development ?

I never realized that Prosper. Thank you for that insight. Correct me if I am wrong but I believe that most American's prefer to hear the English language spoken here in the the USA. My immigrant grandparents learned the language so why can't they? I do not feel like a racist because I expect to hear english here in America.

Yes, Prosper, I am aware of China's official recognition of 55 minorities. The reality is that the Han Chinese, who are the majority, are the dominant group--as they should be. However, I disagree with many of their actions, like the slow genocide they're committing in Tibet.

Also, if you go back far enough, everyone came from somewhere else. The Mestizos are from Asia. The Chinese came to China from the west, then moved south, killing or assimilating the Tai people who were already there (which is why southern Chinese are darker and shorter than their northern brethren). You French are an amalgamation of Franks & Celts, probably on top of the Neolithic people whose clearest descendants are the Basque.

So what?

Why is it only whites have no right to nations where they are the majority? Why is it only whites can be "racist"? Aren't both of those ideas intrinsically racist, as they treat whites as different from everyone else?

Teresa,

Earlier generations of immigrants--who were legal, of course--wanted to become Americans.

The illegal alien Mestizo invaders are colonists. They have no interest in becoming Americans or assimilating to us. They prove this with their refusal to give up the most obvious sign of their foreigness--their language. They also maintain loyalty to Mexico (or whatever South American disaster of a country they ran away from because they couldn't make it there). They maintain their diets, they make social contacts with others of their ilk, they send their money back home.

BTW, may I suggest that you complain--politely--evey time you have to press "1" for English? I always do, and the operator almost always agree with me.

Politics & Popularity......

With the religious fervor that the dimocrats follow polling data in mind, one item I ran across yesterday while surfing some other websites is recent polling data in the State of Nevada which shows Harry Reids approval rate among registered voters in the dimocratic party there is currently at 19%.

One would think these poll driven traitors would flee in panic from any association with Dirty Harry , his policies or anything he states. It seems a foregone conclusion that Dirty Harry will face the wrath of Nevada voters next time around, cannot come soon enough for me.

The arrogance of dimocrats in their ceaseless quest for power & position with dis-regard for the will of the people never fails to amaze me. So does the continued suppport by the dimocratic base who really are those most abused by the dimocrats in the first place.

If as the polls suggest Harry will have his ass & walking papers handed to him ......He will be able to view his asshole award without the need of holding a mirror to see his rearend.