Warning! Warning! Warning! Warning! Warning! Warning!
If you have a weak stomach, read no further.
So there I was this morning, reading the Atlanta Urinal and Constipation and I came across the following story.
COMMENTARY: Clinton's classy clandestine cleavage Appearance thereof says she's evolved.
Evolved? You mean she has become human?
There was cleavage on display last week on C-SPAN2. It belonged to Sen. Hillary Clinton.
And I had just finished breakfast. The only time I would like to read cleavage and Hillary Clinton in the same sentence would be sumpin' like this:
Hillary Clinton appeared at her sentencing hearing for blackmail, perjury, obstruction of justice and campaign finance violations in one of her signature pantsuits with her blouse unbuttoned to show cleavage.
But no. We have this:
She was talking on the Senate floor about the burdensome cost of higher education. She was wearing a rose-colored blazer over a black top. The neckline sat low on her chest and had a subtle V-shape. The cleavage registered after only a quick glance. No scrunch-faced scrutiny was necessary. There wasn't an unseemly amount of cleavage showing, but there it was. Undeniable.
If C-SPAN is gonna broadcast stuff like this, they should put up a warning notice.
It was startling to see that small acknowledgment of sexuality and femininity peeking out of the conservative —- aesthetically speaking —- environment of Congress.
The only time I expect to see sexuality, femininity, and Hillary Clinton in the same paragraph is if the author mentions her total lack of sexuality and femininity.
After all, it wasn't until the early '90s that women were even allowed to wear pants on the Senate floor.
Fortunately for both us and Hillary since Her Thighness has horrible legs (and boobs).
It was even more surprising to note that it was coming from Clinton, someone who has been so publicly ambivalent about style, image and the burdens of both.
Right! Hillary doesn't care about her public image. Like that's her real hair color. She probably spends as much on her hair as John Edwards does on his. Why do you think she waddles around in pantsuits? Because she looks like crap in a dress or a skirt. She looks like crap in a pantsuit as well, but not as bad as when she shows her legs.
The cleavage, however, is an exceptional kind of flourish. After all, it's not a matter of what she's wearing but rather what's being revealed.
Aieeee! My eyes! Although Ted Kennedy was probably sizing her up.
It's tempting to say the cleavage stirs the same kind of discomfort that might be churned up after spotting Rudy Giuliani with his shirt unbuttoned just a smidge too far. No one wants to see that. But really, it was more like catching a man with his fly unzipped. Just look away!
You don't have to tell me that!
Myabe Hillary is worried that John Edwards is being more feminine than she is so she's showing some cleavage to prove that she's got boobs and Edwards doesn't.
She's got boobs (but I don't want to see them). John Edwards is a boob.
Posted by denny at July 23, 2007 03:39 PMBetter to show some cleavage as to show her ass. Oh she does this daily by opening her mouth.
Posted by: gene Hall on July 23, 2007 04:15 PM"Hillary Clinton appeared at her sentencing hearing...."
In a perfect world, that would have been around 9 years ago. But . . . today we're more interested in partisan politics (read "blind liberals"), sexual charisma (read "Slick Willy"), and Bush-bashing (read "it's high time we tossed out the good ol' white boys' network and installed a woman as PotUS") than applying normal standards of ethics, morals, and black-letter law across the board regardless of position, wealth, or associations.
Posted by: eros total on July 23, 2007 04:35 PMYup,
Hillary has boobs. One is named Bill, and the other is Janet Reno.
Hillary and cleavage? How about an account in which Ragnar, a tempermental Viking berserker, brandishes his ax before giving Hillary some new cleavage? I sort of like that image. Feel better?
Posted by: Rurik on July 23, 2007 09:10 PMDo you think she has brown chewies or pink suckies?
Seriously, I think I'm going to barf.
BBBLLLAAAAAARRRGGGHHH!!!
Posted by: formerlib on July 23, 2007 10:56 PMWould an article like this have ever been written about a man? Never! This illustrates one of the many reasons why most women are unsuited to public office and other positions of authority: their sexuality.
The more responsibility associated with a position, the more it is about the position and the less it is about the person. Women are, on the whole, overly concerned with their appearances and their sexual nature. Furthermore, in today's vulgar climate, even middle-aged (and older!) women feel the need to show knees, cleavage, and other parts of their anatomies that most men find, well, repulsive when it's someone that old.
Not all women are ill-suited to high office. Margaret Thatcher and Golda Meir are two leaders who are exceptions to the rule. How many others are there? I can't think of any.
Yet one more reason to hope this vain socialist never makes it as far as being the Deomcratic candiate.
Posted by: Squidley on July 23, 2007 11:29 PMformerlib,
fucking thank you very much for that little bit of mental imagery. How in the hell did you allow such an image emerge into your mind. How dare you relate your mental image to the rest of us.
As a consumate nipple licker I may very well have been damaged by your description. In fact, you may hear from my attorney if I am unable to remove that mental picture you created from my mind.
Please, for the love of titties, never, ever provide any description whatsoever (even in jest) of shrillery's nipples.
Posted by: Rastus on July 24, 2007 12:10 AMRastus,
Are you ready for four or eight more years of this shit?
God forbid.
Posted by: formerlib on July 24, 2007 12:28 AMThe hildabeast and sexualtiy in the same sentence?
GMAFB! Thats as bad as describing someone as an exceptionally bright retard, although I must admit I've used that to describe Rat Turds kid.
Some hack was just trying to humanize her, thats all. I guess next will be the kindness and humanity of Osamma bin Laden.
Only from the liberal press.
Nasty. Plain and simple. I'm glad I didn't eat yet.
Posted by: Greg on July 24, 2007 09:29 AMNo photos?
Posted by: Otis on July 24, 2007 12:16 PMWhen I lived in D.C. during the Clinton debacle, there was a joke making the rounds that IMHO summed up Hilary..."Did you hear about the new dress code Hilary has enacted for female White House staff? NO mini skirts!!! Why you ask? 'Cause you can see Hilary's balls when SHE wears one"...
Posted by: WolfDog on July 25, 2007 09:12 PMIt doesn't matter if Hillary shows cleavage or not because they are not real. Hillary is a man, or more of a man than Bill. Besides, Hillary has Bill's dictionary and there are many alternative interpritations of words and deeds in there.
Posted by: Klem Kaddidlhopper on July 30, 2007 04:03 PM