Aren't feminists just the cutest little things? And they're so flexible too, as they spin on a dime to change their positions.
For years they told us that any male having sex with an underling even if it were consensual was sexual harassment. And they even defined sexual harassment as talking dirty to a subordinate, just like Clarence Thomas allegedly did to Anita Hill.
Fast forward to the Clinton years and when Clinton's sexual harassment of Monica, which qualified as sexual harassment by their own definition became a "private sexual matter". And then we had Gloria Steinem defending Clinton for groping Kathleen Willey. What was the big deal? She said stop and he did, thus giving us the "one free grope rule".
For years the femtards have been bitching about the glass ceiling. They've also said that women could have it all: marriage, children, and a successful career.
"I am woman, hear me roar."
Time to spin on a dime again.
In Sarah Palin we have what the feminists have been wanting for years. A role model for young women everywhere. A woman who does have it all: A loving and supportive husband; Five children; A successful career. And what do the femtards want for Sarah Palin? They want her to be a stay at home mom. When did this shit start? When did the femtards want women to stay at home? What next? Barefoot and pregnant?
I'll tell y'all right now, I know at least four successful, strong women (whom I'll be profiling in a later post) who are insulted by this new femtard crap that if you have children you should stay at home.
Here in Sarah Palin we have a woman who is about to crash through that glass ceiling and play with the big boys. And here we have the femtards trying to repair the cracks.
I am woman, see me glaze.
Posted by denny at September 4, 2008 01:15 PM
I agree with you. The idea that she can't be in politics because she has a child with Down's syndrome is silly. But, I think that the followers of Hillary will be inclined to vote for McCain because they feel slighted that Hillary was not vetted.
Posted by: Dkelsmith on September 4, 2008 01:40 PMI agree Dkelsmith. I think a lot of disenfranchised Hillary supporters that were on the line will now likely vote on the Republican ticket this time to 1) express their dissatisfaction of the current Dimocratic actions and 2) show solidarity with the female gender.
I do find it a little interesting (and yes, a little hypocritcal also) that many people I have met will vote for him now because a woman is on his ticket, but isn't that pretty much the same for the Black population voting for JugEars because of his color (or tendency towards their color?).
Posted by: Ray on September 4, 2008 02:22 PMI am not sure, Ray. The die hard Hillary supporters may realize that four years from now it could be Sarah Palin running against Hillary for the top job. The feminists are really in a bind here. If Obama wins, one of two things will happen: a) He could surprise everyone and public approval could carry him through to a second term - delaying Hillary's turn even further. It might also reinforce the idea that having a woman on the ticket is risky. b) He could bomb abysmally and stoke a resurgence of conservatism (which I think we are actually beginning to see), which would also undermine Hillary - particularly if her opponent is the above-mentioned Sarah Palin.
If Obama loses this go-round, Hillary will still have to contend with him during the next one. I don't see him going away any time soon. He will continue to resurface and make a nuisance of himself. If McCain wins, it is quite possible that Palin will run for POTUS in 2012. And the feminists would lose some of their steam by virtue of the fact that Hillary would be competing with another woman. But ... she is Hillary. Who knows what she might be able to come up with now that she has some free time to think ;) .
Posted by: PeggyU on September 4, 2008 03:28 PMOh I'm having soooo much fun watching them nearly turn themselves inside out in order to criticize Ms. Palin. They have become that which they have so reviled over the years and it's the funniest thing I've ever seen.
Posted by: Teresa of Technicalities on September 4, 2008 05:50 PMSpot-On, plain and simple
Posted by: Greg on September 4, 2008 07:43 PMWhodathunkit? Feminazis move the goalposts so far that they now find themselves agreeing with Dr. Laura:
http://tinyurl.com/6oar5m
Posted by: Pat R. on September 4, 2008 09:05 PMNah, Pat. That is really unfair to Dr. Laura. She doesn't hem and haw and justify the oppression of women in fundamentalist Muslim countries.
Posted by: PeggyU on September 5, 2008 01:11 AMThe Daily Dudley....
Is it not amazing......McCain just has to say he is a conservative & his campaign will return to Republican values. He wisely picks a woman conservative as a running mate then the Party is energized & the money starts flowing in.
There is a real message here....I hope he listen`s & heed`s it.
Posted by: dudley1 on September 5, 2008 10:34 AMThe Feminists cannot be happy with Sarah. She is not a feminist. She doesn't hang with a dogma which never worked. She is liberated. She lives her life fully, loving a real man, not believing in abortion, able to function well in so-called-masculine activities without losing one ounce of her feminity and attractiveness. There is no bitterness in that woman, no fear of honesty. She is a classy lady but also feisty.
No wonder the feminists are screaming murder. She is destroying the stereotype so well represented by Hillary.
Talk about Sarah as a role model---and I don't mind if anybody wants to laugh---but I'm trying my old skirts on, and I'll go on a spending spree if necessary. Until I looked at the Republican Convention ladies, I had forgotten how nice it is to show a bit of legs. (Not the Hollywood way or the Bikini style;-) )
Posted by: Claudia on September 5, 2008 12:49 PMShe definitely seems like a classy lady. How refreshing to see a basically "normal" person in high-level politics...
Posted by: Mike on September 5, 2008 04:41 PMI was tempted to see if I too could dress a moose. And actually, yeah, it is pretty tough. They really don't like wearing panty hose.
Posted by: PeggyU on September 6, 2008 04:59 AMSpot on, Denny. These fools make me sick. I never had child support. I worked two jobs to feed my children. These morons don't have a clue.
Elizabeth
Imperial Keeper