That didn't take long.

Stole it from SondraK.
Posted by denny at September 10, 2008 04:07 PMThis is clever! I don't care if BozObama meant it or not. I'm having so much fun with people making fun of him. Maybe he got a snarly earful from the Elitist-Wife for falling into the Lipstick Trap...Those Dummy-Dims have never learned how to laugh at themselves.
Posted by: Claudia on September 10, 2008 05:54 PMhttp://i34.tinypic.com/2vv6muh.jpg
Posted by: hammer on September 10, 2008 07:41 PMThat away Claudia!!!!!!
that is the best way to look at this
The olde pic of her over him with a Rolling Pin saying "you da man ... don't let her steal your Pulpit"
Big Credz to you!!!!!!
Posted by: ty guy on September 10, 2008 08:32 PMDo your presidential races always reach such a low level?
After making jokes with Obama middle name, now most of you are arguing how the perhaps next VP is hot...
No Prosper, it's called a sense of humor. The Frenchies obviously don't have one, but then again, you guys have to deal with your car torchings and Muslim majority, so I guess there's not much to laugh about huh?
Posted by: Ray on September 11, 2008 08:31 AMProsper, don't be hypocritical. I read enough sexual innuendoes about Carla Bruni, on French Blogs and Newspapers, to make my old cheeks redden. French are not very subtle when they speak of fornication. They use a very direct language that I would not want to print here. It's even more risqué when it concerns their leaders.
I hope I'm not insulting Dennis in telling you that the GOC is very tame, even puritanical, in that area. "Hot" is rather a nice term to apply to a mother of five, who has retained her figure, and is obviously in love with her husband. She wouldn't be insulted, and I'm sure her husband doesn't mind being the envy of all the good-thinking, healthy American males.
Simmer down, Frenchman, and tell me how many of you imagined themselves in Sarkozy's bed.
Posted by: Claudia on September 11, 2008 10:40 AMDid you reach your max Ray? What have you got next?
Posted by: Prosper on September 11, 2008 10:46 AMYou are so wrong Mrs Prévost. Sarkosy and his wife are not really popular in my country. And you must live on the other side of the atlantic to think of Sarkosy threw his wife...
And we don't only speak of fornication, we practise a lot. So we are a little bit more satiated, and so less inclined to focus on the "hottnes" of our politicians or their wfie.
"Sarkosy and his wife are not really popular in my country"
Prosper, spoken like a true liberal/socialist. So he's not too popular but he was elected by a democratic form of government no? That tells me he's liked/favored by more rather than less. The morons in this country love to say stuff like that too about Bush, but guess what, he was elected by the people two terms in a row. What does that tell you? They both stole elections? I think not. It should tell you that the majority of people in both countries wanted a more conservative leader. Maybe not the majority of the people you hang out with, or the majority of the people that the liberal press hangs out with, but the poplulation as a whole. When the Republicans win again this year, I have a nice letter I've already written to all the libs in this country that remind them that their values have not been wanted for at least the last 3 terms.
And what is this "max" thing you ask of me?
Prosper.....
Sarkosy & his wife not popular in France? Who voted for Sarkosy in your last election? You either have some massive voter fraud or a bunch of German agents left over from the occupation during WW2.
Or!....Maybe you are just full of crap!
Incidently.....You asked about how low our Presidential election`s might get, first check out the Democrat`s trying to slander Governor Palin,realize this is the Democratic way of doing thing`s. Lastly we understand most of the civilized country`s of Europe,Africa & the Middle East think we should elect Obama instead of McCain. That would be as low as we could possibly get.
Posted by: Dudley1 on September 11, 2008 11:47 AMSarkosy promised a lot, but it was just bullshit, and now he is widely unpopular... Too hard to understand ?
max is for maximum, peak... the best you can do.
Posted by: Prosper on September 11, 2008 12:31 PMYes, facts are the best I can do (the max). That's all that is necessary in an argument. No, you are not allowed to have feelings enter the equation. That's a liberal weakness that I refuse to take part in.
Prosper - I'm not going to extend on the Frenchmen's sexual feats but you seem to forget that I'm in direct contact with your country and its lifestyle. Frenchmen have been well known to practise a lot of their fantasy with their mistresses during prolonged lunch hours. This also happens in America, of course. Even in the White House, as we have seen with Clinton. But to a lesser degree than in the Paris "nids d'amour".
What's wrong with having the "hottnes" for a politician if it translates into a satisfying night with a wife? I never thought it improper for a man to whistle at a pretty woman.
Of course, I have never suggested that you, Prosper, could be guilty of such transgression. But please, let young, (even older), healthy American males appreciate Sarah without pointing your puritanical finger in their direction.
Part of her attraction is also her politics which you would not approve. Is this why you criticize her popularity?
Ms. Prévost....(you're funny, Prosper!)
Posted by: Claudia on September 11, 2008 01:02 PMHow neat is this? We now have a French Canadian who can debate a Frenchman.
Posted by: Denny on September 11, 2008 01:25 PMWell, Prosper, if you're spending all that time fornicating, you might just do your country some good and pop out a few kids while you're at it! Not counting Muslim immigrants, your country's reproductive rate is abysmal. In some European countries, I hear, they are even paying people to have children. A little buck for your bang, I guess.
Posted by: PeggyU on September 11, 2008 01:29 PMPeggyU - Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha!
"A little buck for your bang."
For Prosper, it would be:
"Dans l'trou pour un euro."
We should be ashamed of ourselves, Peggy!
Denny -
French Canadians have been debating Frenchmen ever since France dropped the colony in 1763. "A few acres of snow...", said Voltaire with a shrug of his shoulders. Instead of dying out, we multiplied. France hasn't recovered yet. Sometimes, one arrives in Quebec (like De Gaulle did) and tries to take credit for our survival. We laugh! We owe France NOTHING. And we even improved the language with our picturesque expressions.
But French wines is good. À la vôtre,Prosper!
Posted by: Claudia on September 11, 2008 02:19 PMSorry Peggy, our female fertility rate is the highest in Europe. But keep talking without knowing. as far as you support a woman who believe in creationism, that's fine by me.
Posted by: Prosper on September 11, 2008 03:41 PMPeggy - In Prosper's defense, he does have three children.
Prosper - Your female fertility rate may be the highest on EUrope, but the Moo-slimes are still outbreeding you. Fortunately, they won't take over France while I'm alive so I can still get my Delemain Vesper.
Posted by: Denny on September 11, 2008 03:56 PMIceland (2.07 children per woman) has a slightly higher fertility rate than France (1.98 children per woman). Of course if one counts France's resident population of moslem skanks spitting out future terrorists, than France is probably higher.
Posted by: thatjerryguy on September 11, 2008 05:35 PMProsper -
What many people don't know is that, for some believers, Creationism doesn't necessarily exclude Evolution. It only says that, at one point, God breathed a soul in the well-formed human being. There are so many gaping holes in the Evolution theory that many atheists, well-versed in sciences, call it as much a fairy tale as the Biblical Creation. Darwin himself knew the feebleness of his presentation.
If I have to choose between two fairy tales, I'd say I prefer the Bible Story. Although when I look at the democrats, I have no problem accepting that they are related to apes.
Posted by: Claudia on September 11, 2008 06:09 PMI guess my view of it is this, Prosper. How do you know evolution isn't God's design? You'll have as much difficulty disproving that as you will proving that AGW exists. So it all boils down to faith of one sort or another, doesn't it, since proof is unattainable? If you want to accept nonfalsifiable hypotheses as fact and call them science - instead of the more accurate label, religion - then go ahead ... delude yourself! At least Christianity offers hope that humans have souls and a greater purpose in the grand scheme of things. I find it interesting that many physicists feel that their work moves them closer to God. I don't feel that science and religion mutually exclude.
As to population statistics, I believe the 1.98 percent French fertility rate includes the resident Muslim population. I would bet a more detailed analysis would be less optimisitic. I am actually glad Prosper has done/is doing/will continue to do his part.
Now, the stats are on women's fertility ... but how do you measure men's fertility rates? We know French women have the second highest fertility rate in Europe ... but how do we know their daddies do? ;)
Posted by: PeggyU on September 11, 2008 07:09 PMBTW if anybody is interested in learning more about a Creationism which doesn't adhere to a strict biblical literalism, it's called the Modern Intelligent Design Movement. It's adopted by many Christians. I got the informations on THE CONSTRUCTIVE CURMUDGEON Blog. Very good articles with much approbation for Governor Palin, and much indignation for the way the Democrats and Feminists are treating her VP nomination.
Posted by: Claudia on September 11, 2008 07:12 PMClaudia and PeggyU - well said. As a fellow Christian I don't discount evolution as unlikely or irrelevant...
I better go now. I am going to hide the cheese and lock the doors. don't want any of these new french babies coming by to steal my Venezuelan Beaver Cheese or surrender to me.
Posted by: patrick on September 11, 2008 10:55 PMthatjerkyguy, Iceland's population is 300,000. Grow a brain.
PeggyU, of course it includes the resident muslim population! We are a secular nation, and we don't care of our fellow citizens faith. We would never put "in God we trust" on euros. (By the way, does that mean that atheists like Denny are bad americans?).
About daddies' fertility... yeah, it's a well known fact that our women are banged by angry muslims. Fortunately, those evil bastards eat most of their progeniture.
Patrick, don't forget to get rid of your wife too. Her armipts smell the same (and that's why you like her so much, you disgusting rascal!)
Claudia, many christians, really? on one single side of the Atlantic then!
Posted by: Prosper on September 12, 2008 03:26 AMWe would never put "in God we trust" on euros. (By the way, does that mean that atheists like Denny are bad americans?).
Way to put words in her mouth Prosper. I knew you wouldn't let me down...
Of course you "would never put 'in God we trust' on euros"...
...Why would you do that when you could put "allah akbar" instead?
Posted by: CharlieDelta on September 12, 2008 03:39 AMTwo places were religious zealots are the most active : North America and Middle East.
Glad to be as far from each one...
Prosper -
The Middle East zealots have already subtly invaded Europe. They're right on your front step. And you don't seem to see it. Be careful, Prosper. Those people don't knock at the door before they enter. They just throw a bomb in. Or they build a mosque across the street. And the next day their laws govern your country.
You're a bright man. Surely you must realize what's happening in France and England (to name only two).
Posted by: Claudia on September 12, 2008 09:19 AM"thatjerkyguy, Iceland's population is 300,000. Grow a brain."
So how does your wooden-headed, idiotic comment discount the fact that Iceland's fertility rate is higher than France's? Perhaps when you grow a brain (you'll first have to empty all the shit clogging up your skull) you can give an intelligent answer.
Posted by: thatjerryguy on September 12, 2008 09:23 AMOr they build a mosque across the street. And the next day their laws govern your country.
Here is some interesting reading Claudia.
3 Mosques in France, 25 in the USA and 4 in your country.
So my country has less mosque by inhabitant than Canada or USA. Interesting, isn't it?
;-)
Posted by: Prosper on September 12, 2008 11:10 AMProsper -
As for your mention of " Many christians?...On one single side of the Atlantic, then." I know that Europe (specially France) is anticlerical. It doesn't stop intelligent atheists, all over the world, to question the loopholes of Evolution, and to seek an acceptable and deeper answer to explain the wonderful design of Creation.
Have a good day. All the best to you, and family. Across the sea, you're in my prayers.
Posted by: Claudia on September 12, 2008 11:27 AMProsper.....
More Interesting Facts;
1.Number of muslims in France [5,955,123 known] 10% of the population. Ratio of muslims to a single mosque [1,985,041 to 1]
2.number of muslims in USA [9,732,001 known] 3.5% of the population. ratio of muslins to a single mosque [389,280 to 1]
3.number of muslims in Canada [473,892 known] 1.5% of the population ratio of muslims to a single mosque [118,473 to 1]
From the above....it is obvious French muslims are not as religious, or have 3 really large mosque`s. people who are not religious tend to be thieves,liar`s or criminals.
Canadian muslim`s appear to be the most religious, therefore most law-abiding.
American muslim`s are in the middle but we still do not trust them very much.
Anyway ,lets get back on topic......
Posted by: dudley1 on September 12, 2008 11:37 AMProsper -
Do you think I didn't know that? I spoke from experience. A mosque was built right next to our biggest pilgrimage Cathedral (Ste-Anne de Beaupré, Québec.) It was done sneakily. One day it just appeared. The danger is EVERYWHERE. Don't give me numbers.
The problem with you is that you don't seem to know that we're under attack, and that our civilization is threatened. It's not possible to be at peace with Muslims. Their laws are the only ones they will tolerate.
Posted by: Claudia on September 12, 2008 11:43 AMWhy are y'all wasting good range time on a Frog troll, anyway? He's French, fa Christ's sakes: they haven't been important enough to care about in a century.
Posted by: DaveP. on September 12, 2008 11:44 AMI agree with dudley1. Let's get back to the topic. What was it? Ah! oui...American males sanctioned by a Frenchman for lusting for a "hot" VP....WOW, that's a lot more interesting than Theology and Mulsumans!
AuRevoir, Prosper. I'm out...
Posted by: Claudia on September 12, 2008 11:53 AMNo ... How would being an atheist make Denny a "bad American"? I don't think you can construe that from anything I have said. Denny is broad minded enough to recognize that what some people claim as science is merely a pathetic substitute for religion. In reading his writings on global warming and environmental "science", you can certainly pick up on this!
In fact if you want to read a really interesting essay on the historic and religious roots of environmentalism, read Robert Bidinotto's Environmentalism or Individualism.