January 10, 2009

Give An Egg For Obama

A woman wants to trade her ovary and that of one of her friends for two tickets to Jug Hussein Ear's coronation. Fausta has the details.

The ovaries, which range in age from 26 to 27 years, come with no strings attached. “Today, you can get an ovary from two separate, progressively minded women who are willing to part with their internal organs for a chance to wear a party dress in the same room as President Elect Obama,”

May as well. If they did use them, they'd prolly abort the baby. What idiots! Hmmm! Lawyer. Progressive. Idiot. Reminds me of someone but I just cannot seem to put my finger on who it is.

Liberalism really is a mental disease.

Posted by denny at January 10, 2009 01:25 PM  
Comments

Not only a lawyer, but a Cleveland Lawyer. Dennis Kucinich is a Cleveland Lawyer, too.

Posted by: Ralph Gizzip on January 10, 2009 02:19 PM

Say, isn't it illegal to sell body parts?

Posted by: B....... on January 10, 2009 05:39 PM

This is just plain sick, these creepy womens should be killed. Twice.

Posted by: LisaKay on January 10, 2009 07:07 PM

This is just plain sick, these creepy womens should be killed. Twice.

Posted by: LisaKay on January 10, 2009 07:07 PM

Take the eggs - then destroy them. Stupidity should not be allowed to reproduce.

Unfortunatly, retro-active birth control is against the law.

Posted by: Jane Austen on January 10, 2009 07:19 PM

Liberalism is Not a disease. It's more like growing up and having an open mind. Fucktard. Opps.

Posted by: Teresa on January 10, 2009 09:49 PM

"...having an open mind."

RIIIIIIIIGGGHHT - just as long as you agree with my "progressive agenda.

Posted by: emdfl on January 10, 2009 10:20 PM

I'm assuming that has to be a joke. Although, I will admit that I once considered selling my eggs (not my ovaries!). When I lived in Seattle, there were often ads in the classifieds from people who were willing to pay thousands for eggs to use in artificial insemination. Unfortunately, you had to be in your 20's, super healthy, have graduated from an Ivy league school, be tall, blonde, blue eyed, etc.....

Well, I guess that let's me out!

I'm a short, natural red head, in my 40's, with all kinds of inherited knee problems which I've had 7 surgeries to correct...and I come from a family of alcoholic/drug addicts. I don't think they're looking for my kind! But damn, it would have been an easy job that pays reallyyyyy well!

Posted by: DogsDontPurr on January 10, 2009 11:58 PM

DDP,

Its not fair; if they don't want your genotype file an affirmitive action suit.

Posted by: Rurik on January 11, 2009 01:01 AM

DogsDon'tPurr: I don't think it's an easy job, from what I've read. It involves hormone shots that really mess you up ... and who knows what the long-terms consequences are? I just don't think it's worth it for money alone.

Posted by: PeggyU on January 11, 2009 05:02 AM

DogsDontPurr
You Sound HOTT!!!!!!!!

Posted by: ty guy on January 11, 2009 05:14 AM

DDP...and think how Easy it is for a man to give!!!!
DIsgusting is it not????
Good Post tho'
PeggyU ...U up????

Posted by: ty guy on January 11, 2009 05:17 AM

"...retro-active birth control..." That is a criminal defense strategy waiting to happen. "It wasn't murder, your honor, but retro-active birth control."

Ovaries can't be transplanted and they will not survive outside the body. With that in mind, I wish them much success in finding someone to take them up on their offer. Thin the herd.

Posted by: Jackie D on January 11, 2009 10:10 AM

Well, ty guy, I was still awake ... but I'm in a different time zone ;) It was still late (or early?), though. Gotta start going to bed earlier, I know ... but it's quiet enough around here to think during the small hours of the morning.

Posted by: PeggyU on January 11, 2009 02:29 PM

Socialist Sally & a friend make the news!

Posted by: Dudley1 on January 11, 2009 03:16 PM

"Unfortunatly, retro-active birth control is against the law." Not in an Obot's world. They have the born alive act to fall back on. Right now they only murder babies up to age 'one day' but they will increase that after Jan 21st.

Posted by: Scrapiron on January 11, 2009 05:15 PM

Scrapiron -

Pro-Life people will fight Obama on his outrageaous, criminal abortion agenda. In the inspiring words of Richard John Neuhaus: "We shall not weary. We shall not rest." His beautiful, courageous speech, at the last Pro-Life convention, is on the web. Just Google his name. Every good-thinking American, with a conscience, can read it with so much pride that some people, in USA, have the fortitude to fight for the unborn.

Posted by: Claudia on January 11, 2009 05:40 PM

Wow, too bad your parents weren't sterile. This was a joke you morons - don't you understand satire?

Posted by: Melissa on January 11, 2009 09:21 PM

Melissa - Have you read the rules of this site?

Posted by: Denny on January 11, 2009 10:33 PM

From Webster's: Satire 1: a literary work holding up human vices and follies to ridicule or scorn

So Melissa, you may brand me a moron and wish retro-active reproductive failure upon my parents but I don't consider Craig's List to be the preeminent site for literary work. Apparently liberal humor includes knowingly proposing an illegal activity in connection with the inauguration of their anointed one. There is nothing innovative or creative in this sad attempt to gain attention. On second thought, Craig's List is probably the best outlet for liberal blathering.

Or should we go with the second definition of satire - which is what is about to happen to you on this site...Satire: 2: trenchant wit, irony, or sarcasm used to expose and discredit vice or folly.

Posted by: Jackie D on January 12, 2009 08:57 AM

I wouldn't give a rat's ass for B. HUSSEIN.

Posted by: thatjerryguy on January 12, 2009 09:46 AM

the desease, sir, is conservatism, with it's narrow-mindedness, intolerance, and refusal to akknowledge a woman's rights over her own body. to force a woman to have a baby she does not want, is to deny her agency over herself. to insisst that she has a baby she did not ask for is to place control of her body into the hands of others. it is, in short, slavery, and is thus contrary to civilisation.

conservatism, for all it's nice words, is nothinng but a series of id impulses disguised as a political dogma. it is the inability to accept difference, the adherence to old dogmas. It's time you guys grew up.

Posted by: matthew g on January 12, 2009 11:59 AM

matthew g -

If you call civilisation the right of a woman to kill her unborn child, I pity you. Obviously, you have never witnessed an abortion. Nor the women who are allowed and encouraged to choose it. Most of them, if they have a soul, regret it bitterly later on in life. As civilised people, our duty is to teach our children, males and females, to practice birth control before a child is conceived.

Sometimes, when I look at the human race, and how far we have gone in our cruelty to a defenseless unborn child, I wish that our legendary mother, Eve, would not have conceived any of us...

Don't bring the cases, where an abortion might be needed. I am a nurse and I know them all...I also know all the false excuses which are invented to get rid of an unloved baby. What is so neglected and ignored is that many people would want to love that child if the mother would accept to carry him/her to term.

"We shall not weary. We shall not rest." In America, and in Canada, we will speak for the rights of the voiceless children.

Posted by: Claudia on January 12, 2009 12:39 PM

Matthew - In the world that you want, you would have prolly been aborted. Ponder on that. Ponder also all the people who were killed in the old Soviet Union, China, and Indo-China in the name of socialism. Also think of all the deaths the National Socialist Party in Germnany was responsible for in WWII.

In our country, liberalism, in the War on Poverty has created a permanent underclass responsible for the gummint for their support. The Dimocrats want to give poor people money and keep them dependent on gummint. The Republicans want to teach them how to make money and be independent. That's why I am a libertarian/conservative. My sister and I pulled ourselves out of poverty. That's why I believe in the American Dream.

I'm sorry Matthew, I see far more intolerance on the left than I do on the right. Start cruising some of the left wing sites like Kos and read the hatred spewing from the people there. These people make my more rabid commenters sound like Ghandi by comparison.

Posted by: Denny on January 12, 2009 12:51 PM

If conservatism is a disease because of "narrow-mindedness and intolerance", then what is liberalism? A full-blown epidemic?

Posted by: thatjerryguy on January 12, 2009 01:40 PM

Matthew G......

It is freedom, self reliance, independence & the ability to create or develop without an oppressive aristocracy over ones life which has created the most powerful, benevolent& advanced Nation to have ever existed on this Planet. It was founded on the premise of individual freedom & limited government. .........The guiding premise of Conservative thought.

It is Liberalism,Socialism or any form of Central oppressive Governmental Structure which has destroyed all previous civilization`s. When a Government is no longer in place to serve the people, it is just a matter of time until the people must serve the Government. The progression from Conservative independence to Liberalism to Socialism to Tyranny has been long recognized.

It is too bad your Liberal Socialist professors are so absorbed in their quest for tenure. They have obviously forgot the purpose for their employment which was to teach & instruct within the framework of a free independent country & to provide you with the educational skills to advance the quest for the advancement of mankind.When I was a young student ,we were taught to think & reason, not blindly follow an agenda.

What you & your contemporaries are being force fed is a formula designed to promote the destruction of this country , its freedoms & replace it with a system of obedience to the state & the aristocracy which governs it.

The only problem is every time people lost control of their destiny in the past.....the civilization or country ended up on the trash heap with the people subjugated or destroyed along with the utopia which replaced it.

I really have to question your ability to think for yourself or to recognize the difference between truth & propaganda. Open your eyes young man, reality is there in front of you, all you have to do is use your head for something other then a hat rack.

Posted by: dudley1 on January 12, 2009 04:26 PM

Matthew G.: Please read Thomas Sowell's A Conflict of Visions. It is an interesting analysis of the philosophical differences between conservatism (primarily constrained view) and liberalism (mostly unconstrained view), as well as Marxism (which Sowell says combines elements of both perspectives). And your condescension is also a hallmark of liberalism, and it is based on a particular unconstrained belief: that select "enlightened" humans should serve to pass knowledge to others and should govern through reason.

This paragraph, though poorly written, does capture the essence of the conflict:

conservatism, for all it's nice words, is nothinng but a series of id impulses disguised as a political dogma. it is the inability to accept difference, the adherence to old dogmas. It's time you guys grew up.

Constrained thinking is based on the acquired and collective common knowledge of the people - customs and beliefs that stand the test of time become part of our basis for analyzing situations and making decisions. Essentially, conservatives believe in a kind of Darwinian evolution of civilization, and believe that long-standing institutions and ideas survive because they are practical and widely useful. This is what you refer to as "the adherence to old dogmas". In a nutshell, conservatives believe tradition represents accumulated wisdom and so "change" does not necessarily equate with "right" or "good". Conservatives weigh the cost vs. benefit of change. The end may not justify the means as a result. People are most often likely to be motivated by selfish concerns. The pursuit of individual goals may have positive, negative, or no repercussions for society at large.

The unconstrained view of liberalism looks upon tradition as accumulated waste, not useful for contemporary planning and decision making - hence the contempt for historic contracts like the Constitution. Man is seen as a work in progress. This view holds that circumstances and institutions keep people from achieving their purer objectives. Man has the potential to behave selflessly, to strive for the perfection of the human condition. That is the goal, and all routes to achieving it are considered valid; the cost of the approach is irrelevant.

The constrained vs. unconstrained model does a good job of explaining conservative and liberal views on social issues, religion, economics, etc. (Sowell cautions, and any sensible reader would conclude, that it is simply a model and no individual or institution can be quite so neatly pigeonholed. As a general classification tool it is useful.)

Posted by: PeggyU on January 13, 2009 05:38 PM

."lso think of all the deaths the National Socialist Party in Germnany was responsible for in WWII."
- nazism is a far right, not far left, agenda. with it's doctrines and rigid beliefs, it is far closer to that which you believe in thanthat which I do.

"we were taught to think & reason, not blindly follow an agenda."
- I think perfectly well, long hard and independently. given your refusal to accept other ways of doing things, it is you who is blind

Sack it, no point arguing with fanatics.

Posted by: matthew g on January 15, 2009 12:09 PM

Matthew G: Are you a college student? You say you think "well, long hard and independently (sic)". Apply some of your analytical skills and independent thinking to a real-life problem. If I were you, I'd hunt down the English professor and demand a rebate. College costs have been climbing and it is projected that they will escalate dramatically this year. Seriously, dude, insist on getting your money's worth! I think they owe you a second go at it free of charge. I'm not even kidding. Clean up your language skills. Make it a point to use them - even in casual writing. Otherwise, you won't be employable. We are counting on you to get a lucrative job. After all, someone's got to pay for our free healthcare. I'm pretty sure that someone is you.

Posted by: PeggyU on January 15, 2009 01:40 PM

Matthew - How can you think independently when you parrot your professors' beliefs? Sorry dude, but you are the one with the rigid beliefs. I beg to differ about Nazism. It was not far right. Why do you think it was called the National Socialist Party? Why do you think Hitler and Stalin got along so well until Hitler attacked the USSR? And I'm no more a fanatic than you are. You should know that by now. I believe in legalizing drugs. I believe gays should be allowed to serve in the military. And even though I'm morally opposed to abortion, I do not want to make it illegal, with the exception of so called "partial birth abortion". I suggest you do some independent reading. Start with Animal Farm. Then 1984. Then Atlas Shrugged.

Peggy - This will piss Matthew off but I'll tell you the reason his typing is not so good. He suffers from Cerebral Palsy. He has been a work in progress for me. Every now and then, I can drag him more to the center, but then he just spouts the bullshit that he is getting brainwashed with. The irony is, he calls me a fanatic. Projection at work. BTW, he's a Brit.

Posted by: Denny on January 15, 2009 04:02 PM

Denny: I guess I owe Matthew an apology for dumping on his writing. But since when have disabled people been off-limits to a good pissing off? As cerebral palsy does not affect intelligence or open mindedness, if I were he I would still request a tuition refund. Indoctrination is not education.

I suppose since he's a Brit he has never known freedom of choice in health care. I am American and old enough to have experienced better times. I guess you can't miss what you never had.

Posted by: PeggyU on January 15, 2009 07:01 PM

Peggy - I was excusing his typing, not his thought processes. And you can just imagine the socialist indoctrination he receives in the UK education system. They're prolly worse than the US. I fear I am witnessing the end of Western Civilization. Fortunately, I'll prolly die before it does. It's times like these that I'm glad I never had children.

Posted by: Denny on January 15, 2009 08:04 PM
Post a comment