October 28, 2009

Listen Stan


From Mark.

Posted by denny at October 28, 2009 04:14 PM  

The liberals contempt for the military of this nation never, ever ceases to amaze me. They just cannot, or will not get the connection, that its the same military that protects them as well as the whole nation from tranny. But as one caller to a radio show I listen to a few weeks ago put it so well. "These are not liberals" said the caller, "These are facsists".

Posted by: defshepard on October 28, 2009 04:33 PM

This is shameful.

And no matter who was there, they'd all refuse to "suspend their disbelief".

You guys remember Hilary saying that to Gen. Patraeus? She said that to the man who wrote the Counter-Insurgency document. Unbelievable.

Clinton, Kerry or any other Democrat, they'd all react the same.

They'd all try to find a way to cut and run even if that's not an option.

All this a few days away from Rememberance Day in Canada. Shameful.

Posted by: red collar on October 28, 2009 05:07 PM

What really galls me is that they don't understand why we need a strong military. In their unending quest for that mythical utopia they keep whining about, they forget that the weak inherit tyranny, not friends. Our enemies are watching carefully and they've already decided that Obambi is a pussy and rightfully so.

Posted by: phthaloblu on October 28, 2009 05:30 PM

Read a neat quote today, but can't tell ya if it's legit or not:

"As an American I am not so shocked that Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize without any accomplishments to his name, but that America gave him the White House based on the same credentials." - - Newt Gingrich

Site it's posted on (theospark.net) introduces it by saying, "I don't know if Newt said this or not, but if he didn't, he should have."

Posted by: Ron on October 28, 2009 05:46 PM

McChrystal's gotta be thinking, "If my 401K hadn't tanked I'd give this SOB my stars and park my ass on a nice warm beach somewhere."

Posted by: Ralph Gizzip on October 28, 2009 06:51 PM

Yep, the Halfrican-in-Chief.

Living proof that there are 69,456,897 assholes living in America.

Posted by: Fukitol on October 28, 2009 07:27 PM

Some Commander in Chief...Two days glad handing Royalty and Heads of State in Copenhagen replete with wine and caviar...And, 25 minutes with our combat commander in charge of killing terrorists in the name of this great nation. WTF! I'm sure every time some soldier or Marine takes a $hit he says he's going to take an Obama!

Posted by: Nozzle on October 28, 2009 08:48 PM

Let's not forget Dimocrat President Harry Ass Truman.

He fired Douglas MacArthur because he was afraid to run against him for President. Then established the "Truman Doctrin", ending the first war America didn't win! Korea.

Oh! we didn't lose either. We still have HST's legacey, "The 38th Parallel.

Between Truman and Carter, we're lucky Alaska and Florida are still part of the 50.

With Obama, we can breath a sigh of relief since there is no immediate threat of invasion from China or Cuba.

But keep an eye on Cape Cod and Boston. Under Commander in Chicken Sit,,,,THE FRENCH COULD WIN THIS ONE!!


Posted by: Pete on October 29, 2009 12:07 AM

It's EARLY BOOBAGE! But, if it's a PRIME pair of boobs, doesn't Biden need to be in the picture with the One? Ain't that tit'n'tat?

McChrystal must sit there and think - "Thirty three years of military experience commanding at all levels of the Army. Let's see, I've got to deal with this guy, who has never done a minute in uniform and who hates us. I've got to deal with his idiot vice president who claims to be the great foreign affairs expert, but who has been on the wrong side of EVERY isue for years, and who also hates us. And then there's the White House Chief of Staff, who not only didn't serve in the military, he went to college to study ballet! And he not only hates us, but he also wants to jam gays into every avilable orifice in the military. Is this really why I went to 'West Point?

We are so screwed!

Posted by: Marine6 on October 29, 2009 03:05 AM

Get ready for a real Blow Job from this guy
He made a secret Mission to Visit (Pay Respect?) to the Fallen Soldiers...why???? to look concerned and now he will make a decision to make Soros and the Far Left happy...stating "I will not send more soldiers until the Afganny People learn to fight for themselves"

Posted by: ty guy/Neil on October 29, 2009 08:06 AM

Damn, that soldier's got big feet.

Posted by: Samsam on October 29, 2009 11:03 AM

I can't take credit for this but Its worth the read:

Old Butch

John was in the fertilized egg business. He had several hundred young layers (hens), called 'pullets' and ten roosters to fertilize the eggs. He kept records, and any rooster not performing went into the soup pot and was replaced. This took a lot of time, so he bought some tiny bells and attached them to his roosters. Each bell had a different tone, so he could tell from a distance, which rooster was performing. Now, he could sit on the porch And fill out an efficiency report by just listening to the bells.

John's favourite rooster, old Butch, was a very fine specimen, but this morning he noticed old Butch's bell hadn't rung at all! When he went to investigate, he saw the other roosters were busy chasing pullets, bells-a-ringing, but the pullets, hearing the roosters coming, could run for cover. To John's amazement, old Butch had his bell in his beak, so it couldn't ring. He'd sneak up on a pullet, do his job and walk on to the next one. John was so proud of old Butch, he entered him in the Renfrew County Fair and he became an overnight sensation among the judges.

The result was the judges not only awarded old Butch the No Bell Piece Prize but they also awarded him the Pulletsurprise as well. Clearly old Butch was a politician in the making. Who else but a politician could figure out how to win two of the most highly coveted awards on our planet by being the best at sneaking up on the populace and screwing them when they weren't paying attention.

Vote carefully next year, the bells are not always audible.

Posted by: patrick on October 29, 2009 04:19 PM

You have to wonder how much crap are our military leaders going to take from these pukes before they go all "7 Days in May" on their collective asses.

Can't be soon enough - time is quickly running out.

Posted by: John Galt on October 29, 2009 07:55 PM

If Obama comes up with some half baked "solution" to the Afgan affair I hope Gen McChyrstal Falls on his swoard and resigns. He said that he could not protect his troops and complete his mission without 40,000 more troops. If told to make due with less he should salute smartly and say "Fuck You, Sir"
When Johnson and later Nixon ran the Vietnam war from the Whitehouse, making political decisions instead of military ones, not one General or Admiral resigned rather than getting more of us killed. Navy/AirForce Alpha strikes went in on compass headings from Washington. The same ones in and the same ones out day after day. With the result that the NVA could place their sams so we had to fly right over them. We all know how that turned out.

Posted by: Roger on October 29, 2009 10:22 PM


I have response for a lot of these, but I choose to respond to you. The reason being is that I feel I am most qualified to respond. I am displeased with a lot of things that are going on with government now. Not to the extent that some are, but displeased.

But GEN McChrystal, if I know anything about him, will NOT simply resign in protest. In my opinion, real Officers do not do such a thing. They do the best that they can with the equipment that is afforded to them.

More than likely he will make do with what he has now if he has to....even though he wants more. As a person on the bubble....fucking again...I'd like to have a clearly defined mission, but if not it doesn't matter, a good Soldier, either career or tour, will just say "Roger...WILCO" and move out.

If there is a delay or a pause in thinking I hope it is about whether or not there is a clear cut objective to be gained, and whether or not our sacrifice is worth it. Personally, in Aghanistan, I think it is....

Posted by: Dkelsmith on October 31, 2009 01:56 AM

Jesus Christ.....

I intended to say:

"I have responses for a lot of these questions, but I choose to respond to you. The reason being is that I feel I am most qualified to respond to your question. I am displeased with a lot of things that are going on with government now. Not to the extent that some are, but displeased nonetheless.

Posted by: Dkelsmith on October 31, 2009 02:01 AM

Dkelsmith - And to expand on your comments, right or wrong, we decided over 200 years ago that we would have a civilian commander-in-chief. A good soldier may not like his orders, but if he is a good soldier, he will carry them out.

John - To have a Seven Days in May would lower us to the level of a banana republic. That's the last thing I would like to see.

Posted by: Denny on October 31, 2009 12:46 PM

The United States failed to have a truly effective military when we allowed politicians to start making decisions soldiers' should be making.

I cite that great line from Platoon: "Elias is a water walker, like them politicians in Washington trying to fight this war with one hand tied around their balls."

No more need be said.

Posted by: Marksman2000 on October 31, 2009 01:10 PM

Military Strategy...Then & Now!

President Carter..... Downsize, surrender,Grovel & World is shocked!
President Reagan......Rebuild & Bring down the Soviet Union, Restore Honor, Pride & World is in awe!
President Bush1.......Fight war,Win, American military pride soar`s & free world rejoices!
President Clinton......Downsize again, demoralize armed forces, Enemies are puzzeled & world trembles!
President Bush2.......Rebuild, Fight , Win, Restore Honor& Pride, United Nation`s is dismayed, but Iraq is free!
President Obama......Downsize again, Cut defense programs, disgrace America,Insult American Military Leadership , Socialists, Communist`s & Jihadist`s rejoice!

Seem`s to be a definable pattern here don`t you think?

Posted by: dudley1 on November 2, 2009 12:18 PM
Post a comment